View Single Post
  #33  
Unread 06-18-2018, 05:57 PM
EtH
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rant View Post
AC's isn't the only crew. Your inactivity is inherently, then, inconsequential to the foundation of the premise.

If AC's were the only crew, then this limit would not affect voting. But, because ACs is one of multiple crews, a universal limit to crews propagates the growth of the voting pool.
Now you're going to deflect onto other crews. Anbu, Red Ribbon and Apoc each have less than 9 active members contributing to the site. So unless you continue to give massive weight to inactive people who's inclusion in a crew is entirely irrelevant to your foundation, ALL of the current crews are well within the guidelines laid out.

Why must we reshuffle our members if we already fit all the needed criteria?
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-18-2018, 05:57 PM   #33
 
EtH
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rant View Post
AC's isn't the only crew. Your inactivity is inherently, then, inconsequential to the foundation of the premise.

If AC's were the only crew, then this limit would not affect voting. But, because ACs is one of multiple crews, a universal limit to crews propagates the growth of the voting pool.
Now you're going to deflect onto other crews. Anbu, Red Ribbon and Apoc each have less than 9 active members contributing to the site. So unless you continue to give massive weight to inactive people who's inclusion in a crew is entirely irrelevant to your foundation, ALL of the current crews are well within the guidelines laid out.

Why must we reshuffle our members if we already fit all the needed criteria?
 
Reply With Quote