Quote:
Originally Posted by ILLoKWENT
its a well known fact he used chems before, ..what im saying is this particular incident just doesnt make sense for him to use it again, knowing full well it will turn even more countries against him.not to mention , why use it when he already has upper hand..
|
There's other proof that he didn't do it the first time too. Not saying he never would or that he wouldn't but there's a few good vids with an alternative narratives you can find if interested.
---------- Post added at 07:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:56 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILLoKWENT
you could also look at this on a conspiricist level, as a wag the dog event to try and take focus off of russia and trumps relationship.. heres the scenario, russia tells syria to play along, use a syrian airbase thats either obsolete or vacant, stage chem attack.. evacuate base, let trump know about plan, trump goes on record as to bomb base... result.. 1.trump shows the world, democrats especially that hes not friends with russia by attacking syria, 2.he now shows n.korea and iran that he will not hesitate to use unilateral force if needed, 3.takes heat off of the russia trump investigation.. . every one involved, russia, usa, and syria are in on the whole thing
|
I think you're right for Assad to attack now seems dumb and counter productive. As far as point 1 goes I think that's possible for sure as well as your second point but the 3rd one is far fetched. The Trump investigation was just a cover. He's been being surveilled since Bush.