View Single Post
  #10  
Unread 07-22-2014, 02:38 AM
Rant
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbow Dash View Post
Read my response to Terra. It doesn't have to be.
Your stance on the decay of particles may be true, but, what you are failing to factor, is that in this instance, there is no regeneration of the particles which have decayed, without the principles of a cyclic stance on the universe. This means, then, that there is no way for our own selves to continually be restructured to "live forever" as you put it.
Reply With Quote
Unread 07-22-2014, 02:38 AM   #10
 
Rant
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbow Dash View Post
Read my response to Terra. It doesn't have to be.
Your stance on the decay of particles may be true, but, what you are failing to factor, is that in this instance, there is no regeneration of the particles which have decayed, without the principles of a cyclic stance on the universe. This means, then, that there is no way for our own selves to continually be restructured to "live forever" as you put it.
 
Reply With Quote