FVC Will Soon Be No More Because

[IV]

Doesn't that defeat the previous remarks of 'people only vote on the dope battles but ignore the not-so-good battles'? you're the head text mod, you of all people should be back up either ticket or just c's idea and not be saying it's our own faults we don't get votes because our battles are wack.

To decide if a battle isn't very good or not, you have to read it first. If you've already read it why not vote?........ so sort of an invalid point. Respect you both but thats a bit of a stupid thing to say, a person has to read the battle before they can label it good or bad

---------- Post added at 10:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:59 PM ----------

@RULE @Krhyme SAVES

[IV]

Doesn't that defeat the previous remarks of 'people only vote on the dope battles but ignore the not-so-good battles'? you're the head text mod, you of all people should be back up either ticket or just c's idea and not be saying it's our own faults we don't get votes because our battles are wack.

To decide if a battle isn't very good or not, you have to read it first. If you've already read it why not vote?........ so sort of an invalid point. Respect you both but thats a bit of a stupid thing to say, a person has to read the battle before they can label it good or bad

---------- Post added at 10:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:59 PM ----------

@RULE @Krhyme SAVES

[Krhyme Killz]

Originally Posted by Verity

Doesn't that defeat the previous remarks of 'people only vote on the dope battles but ignore the not-so-good battles'? you're the head text mod, you of all people should be back up either ticket or just c's idea and not saying it's our own faults we don't get votes because our battles are wack.

To decide if a battle isn't very good or not, you have to read it first. If you've already read it why not vote?........ so sort of an invalid point. Respect you both but thats a bit of a stupid thing to say, a person has to read the battle before they can label it good or bad

dont be crazy...its illogical to think that a whack battle should get 10 votes...

write to add to the site and to get good votes and buzz going and the votes will come.

[Krhyme Killz]

Originally Posted by Verity

Doesn't that defeat the previous remarks of 'people only vote on the dope battles but ignore the not-so-good battles'? you're the head text mod, you of all people should be back up either ticket or just c's idea and not saying it's our own faults we don't get votes because our battles are wack.

To decide if a battle isn't very good or not, you have to read it first. If you've already read it why not vote?........ so sort of an invalid point. Respect you both but thats a bit of a stupid thing to say, a person has to read the battle before they can label it good or bad

dont be crazy...its illogical to think that a whack battle should get 10 votes...

write to add to the site and to get good votes and buzz going and the votes will come.

[IV]

Originally Posted by Krhyme SAVES

dont be crazy...its illogical to think that a whack battle should get 10 votes...

write to add to the site and to get good votes and buzz going and the votes will come.

Couldnt agree more on your first points, realistic ratings are a massive problems, i know me and @Phroxen are trying to get people to be more realistic with that. What i meant was... you can't say people need to write better to get people to vote, surely you have to have read the battle to determine whether it wasn't very good? by that time you may as well vote.

See my point?

[IV]

Originally Posted by Krhyme SAVES

dont be crazy...its illogical to think that a whack battle should get 10 votes...

write to add to the site and to get good votes and buzz going and the votes will come.

Couldnt agree more on your first points, realistic ratings are a massive problems, i know me and @Phroxen are trying to get people to be more realistic with that. What i meant was... you can't say people need to write better to get people to vote, surely you have to have read the battle to determine whether it wasn't very good? by that time you may as well vote.

See my point?

[Revan]

Originally Posted by Verity

Couldnt agree more on your first points, realistic ratings are a massive problems, i know me and @Phroxen are trying to get people to be more realistic with that. What i meant was... you can't say people need to write better to get people to vote, surely you have to have read the battle to determine whether it wasn't very good? by that time you may as well vote.

See my point?

Your barking up the wrong tree.

I'd like to see you find someone who has voted on more battles than me this month.

But the fact remains that you cannot put the lack of votes problem in the hands of the voters soley.

If a burger doesnt taste nice your not gonna keep buying it.

Gotta tweek that recipe...

[Revan]

Originally Posted by Verity

Couldnt agree more on your first points, realistic ratings are a massive problems, i know me and @Phroxen are trying to get people to be more realistic with that. What i meant was... you can't say people need to write better to get people to vote, surely you have to have read the battle to determine whether it wasn't very good? by that time you may as well vote.

See my point?

Your barking up the wrong tree.

I'd like to see you find someone who has voted on more battles than me this month.

But the fact remains that you cannot put the lack of votes problem in the hands of the voters soley.

If a burger doesnt taste nice your not gonna keep buying it.

Gotta tweek that recipe...