The - Lets Talk About The Rican & Multis Situation Thread

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Sabu

You know the accounts were being shared, i think Rican is taking advantage of that as cover. Convenient excuse. I feel like it’s clearly him operating that account.

But can you PROVE it was him during that final voting? Thats the real question.

And the answer is clearly no.

We have THINK its him and be 90% sure its him.

But i afford EVERYONE the same respect when if comes to infractions.

Regardless, this point should be moot now. As there all getting banned.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Sabu

You know the accounts were being shared, i think Rican is taking advantage of that as cover. Convenient excuse. I feel like it’s clearly him operating that account.

But can you PROVE it was him during that final voting? Thats the real question.

And the answer is clearly no.

We have THINK its him and be 90% sure its him.

But i afford EVERYONE the same respect when if comes to infractions.

Regardless, this point should be moot now. As there all getting banned.

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by RULE

But can you PROVE it was him during that final voting? Thats the real question.

And the answer is clearly no.

We have THINK its him and be 90% sure its him.

But i afford EVERYONE the same respect when if comes to infractions.

Regardless, this point should be moot now. As there all getting banned.

I mean he clearly has the access to the account. In that case you gotta always treat it like it’s the same person. Otherwise they can just always say it isn’t. Sharing accounts in the past can’t just be some infinite free pass for continued access to the others accounts. The fact you removed the votes was a good call in that respect though.

I think the proposed solution is good, in theory, but how can it really be enforced? I mean, it’s already gotten to the point where he was able to create Multis in the double digits

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by RULE

But can you PROVE it was him during that final voting? Thats the real question.

And the answer is clearly no.

We have THINK its him and be 90% sure its him.

But i afford EVERYONE the same respect when if comes to infractions.

Regardless, this point should be moot now. As there all getting banned.

I mean he clearly has the access to the account. In that case you gotta always treat it like it’s the same person. Otherwise they can just always say it isn’t. Sharing accounts in the past can’t just be some infinite free pass for continued access to the others accounts. The fact you removed the votes was a good call in that respect though.

I think the proposed solution is good, in theory, but how can it really be enforced? I mean, it’s already gotten to the point where he was able to create Multis in the double digits

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Sabu

I think the proposed solution is good, in theory, but how can it really be enforced? I mean, it’s already gotten to the point where he was able to create Multis in the double digits

Ive just banned 12 accounts. And im JUST GETTING STARTED.

#Pray4RULE

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Sabu

I think the proposed solution is good, in theory, but how can it really be enforced? I mean, it’s already gotten to the point where he was able to create Multis in the double digits

Ive just banned 12 accounts. And im JUST GETTING STARTED.

#Pray4RULE

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by Rican

I had actual proof that it wasn't me but you as a mod did not bother to see it.

So I think we can stop the false accusations.


Finito.

What are you even talking about, lmao? This case has nothing to do with anything that happened while I was a mod

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by Rican

I had actual proof that it wasn't me but you as a mod did not bother to see it.

So I think we can stop the false accusations.


Finito.

What are you even talking about, lmao? This case has nothing to do with anything that happened while I was a mod