Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody
How the fuck are "as a result" and "as a result of" different?
You used two sentences that were
I think, as a result, I am
I think, as a reuslt of, I am
No fucking shit they won't work in that context. That's basic grammar B. Is that really the strongest counter-argument you can come up with to defend how you completely missed the mark on the definition of "therefore" and how I was only 1 word off? LOL
1 word off is better than getting the definition completely wrong.
I think, therefore I am.
I think, as a result of that, I am.
I think, as a result, I am.
You sleep, therefore you snore.
I snore as a result of me sleeping.
I sleep, as a result, I snore.
Your argument is that the sentence "I think, as a result of, I am" doesn't work. No fucking shit, that's basic grammar. lmao.
When you use words in their proper context your dumbass will cease to defend any incredulous (and losing) arguments that you may have. Go to sleep baby girl.
|
I could explain in more detail why you were wrong in previous posts, and why you are again wrong here, but i's losing its entertainment value. What I think would entertain me one last time is for you to explain how I "got the definition completely wrong." Also, check out the definition of the word "incredulous" before you use it again, because I actually feel like there is a chance, though extremely minute, that you will use it correctly after doing so.