[J u s T C]

@Doomsday™ = right decision but rated the loser a digit or 2 too high. Expo was pretty much spot on besides their not being enough emphasis on the poor wording (mainly the loser) and the dated concepts (The winner) The way I read it the winner had the basic idea on how to punch and play but had stale ideas (1 of them being forced, which u pointed out *Annakin don't = In a can lol*) while the loser had no ideas mixed with really sloppy wording *This FAKES a FRAUD, Stoney chicks?!?!? ect*

Neither were great but the loser was def at a lower level and the rate should reflect that.

---------- Post added at 04:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:52 PM ----------

@X-Calibur = right decision but rated both too high. Pointed out what I said about stoney chicks being gibberish and their being no punches by the loser. Failed to spot Fake and Fraud meaning the same thing so basically being poorly worded nonsense. You need to point things like that out because their are a really big crutch for people starting out, even some "vets" suffer from this atrocious wording and they need to cut it out and start using proper english over nonsense filler. I agree the winners best bar was the Spears 1 but the Federline Spears relationship is like 6 to 10 years old. At it's base It's played as fuck. And that's not just opinion that's fact.

Gave some good advice at the end though about wording their verses so they sound more natural and less forced. It's something people don't pay anywhere near enough attention to on here.

---------- Post added at 04:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:07 PM ----------

@EtH = Wrong decision & rated the winner too high (yeah I know lol)

I agree with the spears line. I think he took the line from a joke site then put "Will" in there to add some sort of relevance but it makes no sense with his name in there other than it sounding lime some gay innuendo. Lol That said though it was still his stand out bar and the best of both verses. And at least he had the basic idea that you need to throw punches and use plays. Potter had none of that and it was so poorly worded I'm really surprised that you voted for him. I can forgive a played punch/Play ("Annakin in a can" WAS wordplay, it was just forced) at least you're trying. But I can't vote for poorly worded nonesense filler statements over that.

Really surprising vote but I get that it's personal preference. That's why I think your vote sucks and you don't

---------- Post added at 04:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------

So it's a toss up between X and Dooms right now?

Is the other guy DQed then now?

Either way I'll be back to pick a winner because it's pretty tight to call. Both had a pretty equal share of good and bad in their votes so I'll have to come back.

[J u s T C]

@Doomsday™ = right decision but rated the loser a digit or 2 too high. Expo was pretty much spot on besides their not being enough emphasis on the poor wording (mainly the loser) and the dated concepts (The winner) The way I read it the winner had the basic idea on how to punch and play but had stale ideas (1 of them being forced, which u pointed out *Annakin don't = In a can lol*) while the loser had no ideas mixed with really sloppy wording *This FAKES a FRAUD, Stoney chicks?!?!? ect*

Neither were great but the loser was def at a lower level and the rate should reflect that.

---------- Post added at 04:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:52 PM ----------

@X-Calibur = right decision but rated both too high. Pointed out what I said about stoney chicks being gibberish and their being no punches by the loser. Failed to spot Fake and Fraud meaning the same thing so basically being poorly worded nonsense. You need to point things like that out because their are a really big crutch for people starting out, even some "vets" suffer from this atrocious wording and they need to cut it out and start using proper english over nonsense filler. I agree the winners best bar was the Spears 1 but the Federline Spears relationship is like 6 to 10 years old. At it's base It's played as fuck. And that's not just opinion that's fact.

Gave some good advice at the end though about wording their verses so they sound more natural and less forced. It's something people don't pay anywhere near enough attention to on here.

---------- Post added at 04:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:07 PM ----------

@EtH = Wrong decision & rated the winner too high (yeah I know lol)

I agree with the spears line. I think he took the line from a joke site then put "Will" in there to add some sort of relevance but it makes no sense with his name in there other than it sounding lime some gay innuendo. Lol That said though it was still his stand out bar and the best of both verses. And at least he had the basic idea that you need to throw punches and use plays. Potter had none of that and it was so poorly worded I'm really surprised that you voted for him. I can forgive a played punch/Play ("Annakin in a can" WAS wordplay, it was just forced) at least you're trying. But I can't vote for poorly worded nonesense filler statements over that.

Really surprising vote but I get that it's personal preference. That's why I think your vote sucks and you don't

---------- Post added at 04:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------

So it's a toss up between X and Dooms right now?

Is the other guy DQed then now?

Either way I'll be back to pick a winner because it's pretty tight to call. Both had a pretty equal share of good and bad in their votes so I'll have to come back.