View Single Post
  #2  
Unread 04-03-2013, 09:24 AM
OSKAR
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,188
Mentioned: 1070 Post(s)
Tagged: 31 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
23 Won / 7 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
4 Won / 5 Lost
Default

Strike first as in what? war?

If yes then

Search 1951 hot war..it has happened before lol. However,South Korea is doing much better than North Korea economically and are to a point that by 2040 they're expected to have the highest GDP in the world. Without a doubt South Korea has the luxury to fund a long run war. The North is not economically capable of funding a war in the long run so it's economy will get crushed.

It was the same in the Cold war with the US and the USSR. The US kept pushing the Soviet's with all these expenses, in the end the USSR couldn't keep up and so the Soviet Union was destroyed.

---------- Post added at 08:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:21 AM ----------

So if they were to fight a war or compete against each other economically, the North will not be able to take it...Consider the North as being the Soviet Union and the South as being America to fit the cold war example i gave befroe
Reply With Quote
Unread 04-03-2013, 09:24 AM   #2
 
OSKAR
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
23 Won / 7 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
4 Won / 5 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2010
Voted: 108 audio / 116 text
Posts: 2,188
Mentioned: 1070 Post(s)
Tagged: 31 Thread(s)


Default

Strike first as in what? war?

If yes then

Search 1951 hot war..it has happened before lol. However,South Korea is doing much better than North Korea economically and are to a point that by 2040 they're expected to have the highest GDP in the world. Without a doubt South Korea has the luxury to fund a long run war. The North is not economically capable of funding a war in the long run so it's economy will get crushed.

It was the same in the Cold war with the US and the USSR. The US kept pushing the Soviet's with all these expenses, in the end the USSR couldn't keep up and so the Soviet Union was destroyed.

---------- Post added at 08:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:21 AM ----------

So if they were to fight a war or compete against each other economically, the North will not be able to take it...Consider the North as being the Soviet Union and the South as being America to fit the cold war example i gave befroe
Offline   Reply With Quote