View Single Post
  #3  
Unread 03-20-2013, 07:57 PM
TradeMarked
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 829
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
192 Won / 93 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record
7 Won / 3 Lost

Estimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
340 Won / 112 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
12 Won / 6 Lost
Default

well @Swagga Lee and @TimmyJack - when they started the whole VP thing witch wasnt long after they started LB every one was at (Zero) in a way it is a good idea but Swagga has a point. so what i think is people with low VP should only be able to vote on another battle if both "Opponents" in that battle has low vp....but that really wouldn't work aether.... so anybody that comes up with a VP idea... will get shot down... for the simple fact that they have it the way they want... and i personally think how they got it works better than most idea's i seen... but Timmy it still is a good idea homie....
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 03-20-2013, 07:57 PM   #3
 
TradeMarked
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.17/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
192 Won / 93 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record
7 Won / 3 Lost

Estimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.17/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
340 Won / 112 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
12 Won / 6 Lost
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Voted: 871 audio / 2062 text
Posts: 829
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)


Default

well @Swagga Lee and @TimmyJack - when they started the whole VP thing witch wasnt long after they started LB every one was at (Zero) in a way it is a good idea but Swagga has a point. so what i think is people with low VP should only be able to vote on another battle if both "Opponents" in that battle has low vp....but that really wouldn't work aether.... so anybody that comes up with a VP idea... will get shot down... for the simple fact that they have it the way they want... and i personally think how they got it works better than most idea's i seen... but Timmy it still is a good idea homie....
__________________
Offline   Reply With Quote