Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums - View Single Post

**Rounin** · #81 01-09-2013, 07:52 PM

Lol @UhMAZING. You mad bro? On a completely unbeef related note. 1) You spelled aggravated wrong. 2) Your concept of a multie isn't completely wrong BUT in this scheme competition the multies you're talking are only most effective in an audio battle. Consecutive 3-5 multisyllabic schemes are best fitted for text battling. 3) You callin someone arrogant but you just said: 3rd you're tourney is lame anyways..I just wanted to beat all you. Haha JS. No offense but I really don't know where you get your ideology from.

**Rounin** · 01-09-2013, 07:52 PM

Lol @UhMAZING. You mad bro? On a completely unbeef related note. 1) You spelled aggravated wrong. 2) Your concept of a multie isn't completely wrong BUT in this scheme competition the multies you're talking are only most effective in an audio battle. Consecutive 3-5 multisyllabic schemes are best fitted for text battling. 3) You callin someone arrogant but you just said: 3rd you're tourney is lame anyways..I just wanted to beat all you. Haha JS. No offense but I really don't know where you get your ideology from.

01-09-2013, 07:52 PM	#81
Rounin Exclusive Member Ranked Text Record 53 Won / 24 Lost Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 0 Lost Join Date: Oct 2012 Voted: 0 audio / 424 text Posts: 218 Mentioned: 376 Post(s) Tagged: 2 Thread(s)	Lol @UhMAZING. You mad bro? On a completely unbeef related note. 1) You spelled aggravated wrong. 2) Your concept of a multie isn't completely wrong BUT in this scheme competition the multies you're talking are only most effective in an audio battle. Consecutive 3-5 multisyllabic schemes are best fitted for text battling. 3) You callin someone arrogant but you just said: 3rd you're tourney is lame anyways..I just wanted to beat all you. Haha JS. No offense but I really don't know where you get your ideology from.
Offline