Quote:
Originally Posted by Mind Fuck
im on the same page
@ NOBLE
when does a round 2/ semi finals commence// |
Sorry I haven't dropped the rest of my votes yet, but I will do them today and still waiting on @
AfterThought's votes.
---------- Post added at 02:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 PM ----------
ROUND 2
@
Ghambit vs @
The Black Book
(
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...287§ion=tb)
Ghambit: Jonny Jigsaw: 5 /
UhMAZING: 7
The Black Book: Jonny Jigsaw: 2 /
UhMAZING: 4
Both of your expos were pretty decent. I felt Ghambit sounded a bit more positive and encouraging. The main thing that stood out to me though was the difference in rating. Ghambit, I felt your ratings were extremely generous. To me, neither one of their verses amonted to a 5 (average). They were both below average, one was just further below than the other. The Black Book's ratings were a lot more accurate and realistic so my my vote goes to him. Vote: The Black Book.
---------- Post added at 03:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------
@
Phroxen vs @
Unyqe
(
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...495§ion=tb)
Phroxen:
Cak3dOut: 6 / Saibot: 4
(
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=452133)
Unyqe:
ladyvenom: 7 / UhMAZING: 5
I felt you both could have been more direct in your expos. What ultimately made my decision was the rating. I felt 7 was a bit high for ladyvenom. He had flow, but no real punches. You were both pretty vague, but Phroxen gave the more realistic/accurate ratings in this matchu-up. Vote: Phroxen
---------- Post added at 03:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:16 PM ----------
@
ShotsFired™ vs @
GOOD GRIEF
(
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...370§ion=tb)
ShotsFired™:
MadVerbs: 8 / Prospect-JS: 7
GOOD GRIEF:
MadVerbs: 7 / Prospect-JS: 6
Both your expos were pretty nice. You both pointed out that Prospect shouldn't have repeated himself. I felt ShotsFired gave the more preferable overall expo. GOOD GRIEF mentioned that Prospect used filler, but the term "filler" is sort of generic and can mean different things to different people, so perhaps it would have been better to define that with context. I felt GOOD GRIEF gave the more accurate ratings. ShotsFired's ratings were a tad bit high, but looking at everything, I'm leaning towards ShotsFired for the better overall vote (almost lost it with the high ratings though). Vote: ShotsFired.
---------- Post added at 04:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:45 PM ----------
Round 3
@
The Black Book vs @
ShotsFired™
(
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...301§ion=tb)
The Black Book:
Cray: 5 / J-WIN: 3
ShotsFired™:
Cray: 7 / J-WIN: 4
I felt The Black Book did a lot better in this match-up, starting with the fact that he was more direct in mentioning the battlers' names while addressing them. He also went further to explain why he voted the way he voted. Vote: The Black Book
---------- Post added at 04:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:05 PM ----------
@
Unyqe vs @
Mind Fuck
(
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=452346)
Mind Fuck: DooX: 4 /
MadVerbs: 5
Unyqe: DooX: 5 /
MadVerbs: 6
I felt Mind Fuck went a little further in his expo. You both could have been less vague, but at least Mind Fuck's expo was a bit more clear with him referencing the "winner" and "loser." Vote: Mind Fuck
---------- Post added at 04:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:14 PM ----------
@
GOOD GRIEF vs @
Ghambit
(
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...458§ion=tb)
Ghambit: BOS 720: 5 /
METH_BARZ: 7
GOOD GRIEF: BOS 720: 4 /
METH_BARZ: 5
[/CENTER][/QUOTE]
You both mentioned that Bos should fill in the box and that they needed to improve their punches. I just felt Ghambit did better at explaining all that. He also mentioned a couple of things that GG didn't. For this matc-up, I'll have to go with Ghambit. Vote: Ghambit.