[J u s T C]

Nah I'm stone cold sober. You don't think it's confusing if I only display title matches (about a good 5 out of the battlers competed in) while the rest jumping up and down the rankings with no record isn't going to be confusing? Your alternative isn't a viable solution and will only confuse people more. We either have records, or we don't, full stop. we don't just document title matches while everyone else who grafted/grinded their bollocks off to climb the rankings by writing and recording for credible opponents get pushed aside. I tell you what, I'll do the rankings with no records, then store the records in small print at the bottom?

[J u s T C]

Nah I'm stone cold sober. You don't think it's confusing if I only display title matches (about a good 5 out of the battlers competed in) while the rest jumping up and down the rankings with no record isn't going to be confusing? Your alternative isn't a viable solution and will only confuse people more. We either have records, or we don't, full stop. we don't just document title matches while everyone else who grafted/grinded their bollocks off to climb the rankings by writing and recording for credible opponents get pushed aside. I tell you what, I'll do the rankings with no records, then store the records in small print at the bottom?