View Single Post
  #119  
Unread 11-16-2012, 09:23 PM
NOBLE
Staff Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,103
Mentioned: 3628 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
Default

I can see the amount of links going into the personal threads reducing, but I don't see it vanishing completely. And is it REALLY that hard to look in two threads? Seriously? You only need to mind your own individual thread. The only time you ever need to check the UVT is if you're not getting enough requests to meet your quota or if you're just looking for something extra to do. Before we had the UVT, people didn't seem to have a problem pasting their links in 4 or 5 threads at a time. I highly doubt that's going to all of a sudden change. Let's just try this out for a while and see how it works. Later down the line, we can re-visit the argument on whether we should just have one thread, but I have several reasons why I don't want just the UVT.
__________________
Unread 11-16-2012, 09:23 PM   #119
 
NOBLE
Staff Hall Of Famer
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2011
Voted: 408 audio / 1061 text
Posts: 6,103
Mentioned: 3628 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)


Default

I can see the amount of links going into the personal threads reducing, but I don't see it vanishing completely. And is it REALLY that hard to look in two threads? Seriously? You only need to mind your own individual thread. The only time you ever need to check the UVT is if you're not getting enough requests to meet your quota or if you're just looking for something extra to do. Before we had the UVT, people didn't seem to have a problem pasting their links in 4 or 5 threads at a time. I highly doubt that's going to all of a sudden change. Let's just try this out for a while and see how it works. Later down the line, we can re-visit the argument on whether we should just have one thread, but I have several reasons why I don't want just the UVT.
__________________
Offline