[Krhyme Killz]

i really think things are best when you dont know your VP. that way there can be no question of your motives in your vote (other than being a dickryder or hater...which will not really change).

really thinking about it...when i see someone with zero VP, and they happened to vote correctly on the battle...my thought is that even a broken clock is right twice a day. its hard to justify moving someone from zero to me. the way i see it...if a mod lowered you to 1, and then someone else lowered you to zero then you would really need to show some really good comments for me to up you a point. i think in general people either care about voting or they dont. the REAL problem is UNEDUCATED voters who leave what appears to be a good expo, but they are just dead wrong most of the time *ahem* VERITY AND FIJI OSA...

i always wondered why the system couldnt just weigh VP. for instance, if you vote for what turned out to be the loser of the battle, your VP goes down by .5% every time it happens. if you vote for the winner, it goes up by .25%. that way, REALLY consist good voting can go up in small increments, and poor voting eliminates itself in smaller increments.

[Krhyme Killz]

i really think things are best when you dont know your VP. that way there can be no question of your motives in your vote (other than being a dickryder or hater...which will not really change).

really thinking about it...when i see someone with zero VP, and they happened to vote correctly on the battle...my thought is that even a broken clock is right twice a day. its hard to justify moving someone from zero to me. the way i see it...if a mod lowered you to 1, and then someone else lowered you to zero then you would really need to show some really good comments for me to up you a point. i think in general people either care about voting or they dont. the REAL problem is UNEDUCATED voters who leave what appears to be a good expo, but they are just dead wrong most of the time *ahem* VERITY AND FIJI OSA...

i always wondered why the system couldnt just weigh VP. for instance, if you vote for what turned out to be the loser of the battle, your VP goes down by .5% every time it happens. if you vote for the winner, it goes up by .25%. that way, REALLY consist good voting can go up in small increments, and poor voting eliminates itself in smaller increments.