Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums - View Single Post

**NOBLE** · #34 09-01-2012, 06:08 AM

@JOSH™ vs @Xplissit
Battle: Ilovehoochies vs ENGINEER
Xplissit Voted: Ilovehoochies: 2 / ENGINEER: 3
JOSH™ Voted: Ilovehoochies: 2 / ENGINEER: 4
Xplissit, I felt you could have done without pasting the lines from the battle and just delved into the expo. You both gave full critiques. I like the fact that Xplissit showed how he scored each bar along the way. The main difference to me was in tone. I felt that JOSH had more of a balance in mixing negative criticism and positive remarks about what the battlers did right. JOSH also pointed out more things they can do to improve, whereas Xplissit spent more time telling them how not strong they are. My vote for this match goes to JOSH™

---------- Post added at 05:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:51 AM ----------

@JOSH™ vs @OSKAR
Battle: kartoondmv vs buc without the k
OSKAR Voted: kartoondmv: 4 / buc without the k: 1
JOSH™ Voted: kartoondmv: 3 / buc without the k: 1
You both mentioned that kartoondmv was lacking punches, but JOSH tried to explain it further by saying he also needed to add a set-up. Although, I did feel those were generic terms. When you told him he needed punches, neither one of you explained what that meant. I'm not saying I expected you to explain it bringing more technical terms that he might not be familiar with. I just wish you guys had explained why its needed in his verse in simpler terms. JOSH added that he should up his multies to 4 syllables, but while doing so, you also seemed to suggest that it was multi-syllables that add complexity, which I don't agree with. OSKAR cautioned him to avoid talking about himself as opposed to his opponent, which JOSH didn't really get into. You both offered suggestions of who he should read. This was pretty close, but I felt OSKAR had the edge in this one. Vote: OSKAR

---------- Post added at 05:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:16 AM ----------

@GRizzEAT vs @MadVerbs
Battle: ~QUANTIZATION~ vs buc without the k
GRizzEAT Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 6 / buc without the k: 5
MadVerbs Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 3 / buc without the k: 1
GRizzEAT offered expos for both battlers, but since buc without the k was disqualified in this battle, I'm only considering the expos you both gave to ~QUANTIZATION~. GRizzEAT was direct and had a personalized bar by bar breakdown, which I felt could have been very useful to the battler. Everything you said was on point. You even had some humor to your expo when you told him " its QUALITY Over KWONTITY." Lol! I think this was your best vote throughout all 3 rounds. MadVerbs, I felt your rating of 3 for ~QUANTIZATION~ was a bit low. I agreed with your assessment and suggestions, but I felt the fact your were indirect made it not as helpful as it could have been. You also didn't cover as many aspects of the battle as GRizzEAT. Vote: GRizzEAT

---------- Post added at 06:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 AM ----------

So all we need is @Dissizit™ to drop 2 more votes: 1 one on StrongSide vs OSKAR and the other on JOSH™ vs OSKAR. Here are the point totals so far:
@GRizzEAT (6 pts)
@JOSH™ (5 pts)+1
@StK StrongSide (5 pts)+1
@Xplissit (4 pts)
@MadVerbs (3 pts)
@OSKAR (2 pts)+2
JOSH and StK StrongSide both have the potential of earning another point. OSKAR has the potential of earning 2 more points. Because we only need 2 Text FVC members at this time, only the top two will be selected. In the event of a tie, I will make the selection. The sooner @Dissizit™ drops his votes, the sooner I can get y'all inducted...hopefully by tomorrow evening. To everyone who didn't make it, thanks for participating. You're more than welcomed to retry next month as we will be holding similar FVC entrace contests at the end of each month.

**NOBLE** · 09-01-2012, 06:08 AM

@JOSH™ vs @Xplissit
Battle: Ilovehoochies vs ENGINEER
Xplissit Voted: Ilovehoochies: 2 / ENGINEER: 3
JOSH™ Voted: Ilovehoochies: 2 / ENGINEER: 4
Xplissit, I felt you could have done without pasting the lines from the battle and just delved into the expo. You both gave full critiques. I like the fact that Xplissit showed how he scored each bar along the way. The main difference to me was in tone. I felt that JOSH had more of a balance in mixing negative criticism and positive remarks about what the battlers did right. JOSH also pointed out more things they can do to improve, whereas Xplissit spent more time telling them how not strong they are. My vote for this match goes to JOSH™

---------- Post added at 05:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:51 AM ----------

@JOSH™ vs @OSKAR
Battle: kartoondmv vs buc without the k
OSKAR Voted: kartoondmv: 4 / buc without the k: 1
JOSH™ Voted: kartoondmv: 3 / buc without the k: 1
You both mentioned that kartoondmv was lacking punches, but JOSH tried to explain it further by saying he also needed to add a set-up. Although, I did feel those were generic terms. When you told him he needed punches, neither one of you explained what that meant. I'm not saying I expected you to explain it bringing more technical terms that he might not be familiar with. I just wish you guys had explained why its needed in his verse in simpler terms. JOSH added that he should up his multies to 4 syllables, but while doing so, you also seemed to suggest that it was multi-syllables that add complexity, which I don't agree with. OSKAR cautioned him to avoid talking about himself as opposed to his opponent, which JOSH didn't really get into. You both offered suggestions of who he should read. This was pretty close, but I felt OSKAR had the edge in this one. Vote: OSKAR

---------- Post added at 05:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:16 AM ----------

@GRizzEAT vs @MadVerbs
Battle: ~QUANTIZATION~ vs buc without the k
GRizzEAT Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 6 / buc without the k: 5
MadVerbs Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 3 / buc without the k: 1
GRizzEAT offered expos for both battlers, but since buc without the k was disqualified in this battle, I'm only considering the expos you both gave to ~QUANTIZATION~. GRizzEAT was direct and had a personalized bar by bar breakdown, which I felt could have been very useful to the battler. Everything you said was on point. You even had some humor to your expo when you told him " its QUALITY Over KWONTITY." Lol! I think this was your best vote throughout all 3 rounds. MadVerbs, I felt your rating of 3 for ~QUANTIZATION~ was a bit low. I agreed with your assessment and suggestions, but I felt the fact your were indirect made it not as helpful as it could have been. You also didn't cover as many aspects of the battle as GRizzEAT. Vote: GRizzEAT

---------- Post added at 06:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 AM ----------

So all we need is @Dissizit™ to drop 2 more votes: 1 one on StrongSide vs OSKAR and the other on JOSH™ vs OSKAR. Here are the point totals so far:
@GRizzEAT (6 pts)
@JOSH™ (5 pts)+1
@StK StrongSide (5 pts)+1
@Xplissit (4 pts)
@MadVerbs (3 pts)
@OSKAR (2 pts)+2
JOSH and StK StrongSide both have the potential of earning another point. OSKAR has the potential of earning 2 more points. Because we only need 2 Text FVC members at this time, only the top two will be selected. In the event of a tie, I will make the selection. The sooner @Dissizit™ drops his votes, the sooner I can get y'all inducted...hopefully by tomorrow evening. To everyone who didn't make it, thanks for participating. You're more than welcomed to retry next month as we will be holding similar FVC entrace contests at the end of each month.

09-01-2012, 06:08 AM	#34
NOBLE <Natural Selection> Staff Hall Of Famer Ranked Audio Record 4 Won / 0 Lost Ranked Text Record 30 Won / 8 Lost Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost Join Date: May 2011 Voted: 408 audio / 1061 text Posts: 6,103 Mentioned: 3628 Post(s) Tagged: 76 Thread(s)	@JOSH™ vs @Xplissit Battle: Ilovehoochies vs ENGINEER Xplissit Voted: Ilovehoochies: 2 / ENGINEER: 3 JOSH™ Voted: Ilovehoochies: 2 / ENGINEER: 4 Xplissit, I felt you could have done without pasting the lines from the battle and just delved into the expo. You both gave full critiques. I like the fact that Xplissit showed how he scored each bar along the way. The main difference to me was in tone. I felt that JOSH had more of a balance in mixing negative criticism and positive remarks about what the battlers did right. JOSH also pointed out more things they can do to improve, whereas Xplissit spent more time telling them how not strong they are. My vote for this match goes to JOSH™ ---------- Post added at 05:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:51 AM ---------- @JOSH™ vs @OSKAR Battle: kartoondmv vs buc without the k OSKAR Voted: kartoondmv: 4 / buc without the k: 1 JOSH™ Voted: kartoondmv: 3 / buc without the k: 1 You both mentioned that kartoondmv was lacking punches, but JOSH tried to explain it further by saying he also needed to add a set-up. Although, I did feel those were generic terms. When you told him he needed punches, neither one of you explained what that meant. I'm not saying I expected you to explain it bringing more technical terms that he might not be familiar with. I just wish you guys had explained why its needed in his verse in simpler terms. JOSH added that he should up his multies to 4 syllables, but while doing so, you also seemed to suggest that it was multi-syllables that add complexity, which I don't agree with. OSKAR cautioned him to avoid talking about himself as opposed to his opponent, which JOSH didn't really get into. You both offered suggestions of who he should read. This was pretty close, but I felt OSKAR had the edge in this one. Vote: OSKAR ---------- Post added at 05:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:16 AM ---------- @GRizzEAT vs @MadVerbs Battle: ~QUANTIZATION~ vs buc without the k GRizzEAT Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 6 / buc without the k: 5 MadVerbs Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 3 / buc without the k: 1 GRizzEAT offered expos for both battlers, but since buc without the k was disqualified in this battle, I'm only considering the expos you both gave to ~QUANTIZATION~. GRizzEAT was direct and had a personalized bar by bar breakdown, which I felt could have been very useful to the battler. Everything you said was on point. You even had some humor to your expo when you told him " its QUALITY Over KWONTITY." Lol! I think this was your best vote throughout all 3 rounds. MadVerbs, I felt your rating of 3 for ~QUANTIZATION~ was a bit low. I agreed with your assessment and suggestions, but I felt the fact your were indirect made it not as helpful as it could have been. You also didn't cover as many aspects of the battle as GRizzEAT. Vote: GRizzEAT ---------- Post added at 06:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 AM ---------- So all we need is @Dissizit™ to drop 2 more votes: 1 one on StrongSide vs OSKAR and the other on JOSH™ vs OSKAR. Here are the point totals so far: @GRizzEAT (6 pts) @JOSH™ (5 pts)+1 @StK StrongSide (5 pts)+1 @Xplissit (4 pts) @MadVerbs (3 pts) @OSKAR (2 pts)+2 JOSH and StK StrongSide both have the potential of earning another point. OSKAR has the potential of earning 2 more points. Because we only need 2 Text FVC members at this time, only the top two will be selected. In the event of a tie, I will make the selection. The sooner @Dissizit™ drops his votes, the sooner I can get y'all inducted...hopefully by tomorrow evening. To everyone who didn't make it, thanks for participating. You're more than welcomed to retry next month as we will be holding similar FVC entrace contests at the end of each month. __________________ Last edited by NOBLE; 09-01-2012 at 06:10 AM.
Offline