[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by UNKNOWN ARTIST

@Just C

what i dont agree with is the fact that revan is no.6 contender and somehow jumped the Q and got a title shot .... its bullshit actually

makes a mockery of the rankings ... why have a poll to vote for ranking placements in the first place

I hear you 100% I know where you're coming from but Reven was in the top 10 rankings. Him battling Phil was a rare set of circumstances. Not only was it an Illmania event. But it was an event that went to a tie breaker. Phil agreed to put his title on the line to up the ante, it wasn't like they just randomly agreed to set up a battle to let Rule jump 5 places up the rankings. Know what I mean?

And didn't you know this was going down? Not sure, but if you did, as the guy running it you could have easily nipped this in the bud by saying no if the integrity of the rankings meant that much. But I don't know.

I guess it just means you'll need to go over the rules and regs for the LBA and make some changes so this kind of thing doesn't happen again. That's all you can really do. Remember it's in it's infancy so little things like this are always going to pop up in the early stages. You'll just have to iron out the creases.

Disclaimer:

I haven't read the rules you set in a while so you might have already made rules for this kind of situation. I don't know.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by UNKNOWN ARTIST

@Just C

what i dont agree with is the fact that revan is no.6 contender and somehow jumped the Q and got a title shot .... its bullshit actually

makes a mockery of the rankings ... why have a poll to vote for ranking placements in the first place

I hear you 100% I know where you're coming from but Reven was in the top 10 rankings. Him battling Phil was a rare set of circumstances. Not only was it an Illmania event. But it was an event that went to a tie breaker. Phil agreed to put his title on the line to up the ante, it wasn't like they just randomly agreed to set up a battle to let Rule jump 5 places up the rankings. Know what I mean?

And didn't you know this was going down? Not sure, but if you did, as the guy running it you could have easily nipped this in the bud by saying no if the integrity of the rankings meant that much. But I don't know.

I guess it just means you'll need to go over the rules and regs for the LBA and make some changes so this kind of thing doesn't happen again. That's all you can really do. Remember it's in it's infancy so little things like this are always going to pop up in the early stages. You'll just have to iron out the creases.

Disclaimer:

I haven't read the rules you set in a while so you might have already made rules for this kind of situation. I don't know.