Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums - View Single Post

**NOBLE** · #28 07-27-2012, 02:44 AM

@Ill Phenom vs @MadVerbs
Battle: SWISHER vs Exiled Samurai
MadVerbs Voted: SWISHER: 3 / Exiled Samurai: 4
Ill Phenom Voted: SWISHER: 3 / Exiled Samurai: 5
MadVerbs kept it short and sweet. He pointed out flaws in the verses and what he felt needed to be improved. He also didn't specify who he was referring to with each comment by name...making statements like "One seemed to have a better idea..." and "Overall one had more..."' I'm assuming he did this so that his expo doesn't sway.
Ill Phenom broke his expo into two parts, each specifically directed at each of the battlers. I felt like he went into more detail outlining problem areas and what the battlers could do to improve them. I feel that most of the time, this is the approach that would actually benefit a battler more when you address them directly...because it could actually go over their head if you're saying "one this" and "one that" while talking about both of them. Truthfully speaking, I've been guilty of it too, and I felt both gave an adequate explanation of their votes, but when comparing the two, I think Ill Phenom's approach is preferrable. Vote: Ill Phenom.

**NOBLE** · 07-27-2012, 02:44 AM

@Ill Phenom vs @MadVerbs
Battle: SWISHER vs Exiled Samurai
MadVerbs Voted: SWISHER: 3 / Exiled Samurai: 4
Ill Phenom Voted: SWISHER: 3 / Exiled Samurai: 5
MadVerbs kept it short and sweet. He pointed out flaws in the verses and what he felt needed to be improved. He also didn't specify who he was referring to with each comment by name...making statements like "One seemed to have a better idea..." and "Overall one had more..."' I'm assuming he did this so that his expo doesn't sway.
Ill Phenom broke his expo into two parts, each specifically directed at each of the battlers. I felt like he went into more detail outlining problem areas and what the battlers could do to improve them. I feel that most of the time, this is the approach that would actually benefit a battler more when you address them directly...because it could actually go over their head if you're saying "one this" and "one that" while talking about both of them. Truthfully speaking, I've been guilty of it too, and I felt both gave an adequate explanation of their votes, but when comparing the two, I think Ill Phenom's approach is preferrable. Vote: Ill Phenom.

07-27-2012, 02:44 AM	#28
NOBLE <Natural Selection> Staff Hall Of Famer Ranked Audio Record 4 Won / 0 Lost Ranked Text Record 30 Won / 8 Lost Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost Join Date: May 2011 Voted: 408 audio / 1061 text Posts: 6,106 Mentioned: 3633 Post(s) Tagged: 76 Thread(s)	@Ill Phenom vs @MadVerbs Battle: SWISHER vs Exiled Samurai MadVerbs Voted: SWISHER: 3 / Exiled Samurai: 4 Ill Phenom Voted: SWISHER: 3 / Exiled Samurai: 5 MadVerbs kept it short and sweet. He pointed out flaws in the verses and what he felt needed to be improved. He also didn't specify who he was referring to with each comment by name...making statements like "One seemed to have a better idea..." and "Overall one had more..."' I'm assuming he did this so that his expo doesn't sway. Ill Phenom broke his expo into two parts, each specifically directed at each of the battlers. I felt like he went into more detail outlining problem areas and what the battlers could do to improve them. I feel that most of the time, this is the approach that would actually benefit a battler more when you address them directly...because it could actually go over their head if you're saying "one this" and "one that" while talking about both of them. Truthfully speaking, I've been guilty of it too, and I felt both gave an adequate explanation of their votes, but when comparing the two, I think Ill Phenom's approach is preferrable. Vote: Ill Phenom. __________________
Offline