Winning a tournament shouldnt have to be a must. Wouldnt Michael Jordan not be HOF worthy if he never got a ring? Pele if he never won a trophy? Its down to skill, impact & legacy imo. Though i concede capturing a "prestigious" site title is a big bonus.
That being said i think people need to remember when making there nominations that the HOF is NOT for skilled battlers alone. Theres probably hundreds of people who are highly skilled, the HOF is for those absolutely legendary site members who have left a lasting legacy and impact on the site.
There are many people who have become bonafide heavyweights on this site, but that alone doesnt equate to HOF status.
Continue nominating whoever you like but no-one will go into the HOF without deserving it.
1/
|