View Single Post
  #44  
Unread 04-05-2012, 06:57 PM
Streetz De Hood
Basic Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,164
Mentioned: 337 Post(s)
Tagged: 17 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.94/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.94/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.94/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
86 Won / 7 Lost
Default

TBH most of the ppl on here wasn't even around when most of the "greats" where heavily active and only know those "greats" even exist is because of those glory day textcees constantly going down memory lane. Obviously looking at LB from a historical approach comp was more intense in years past and everybody knows the comp u have naturally it fuels u to perform better.... those "greats" kind of fell back know and the ones that were average at best when the "greats" where active are know viewed at as the best active on the site... With lesser quality sitting on top today it makes the greats of the past seem even better than the were when they were active and makes the ones on top now seem better because of less quality textcees... I guess what I'm tryna say is it's hard to truly judge a top 25 when everybody's coming from different times, comp level, and expections. And if none of that shit made sense then my bad ma'fuckers...
Reply With Quote
Unread 04-05-2012, 06:57 PM   #44
 
Streetz De Hood
Basic Member
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.94/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.94/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.94/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
86 Won / 7 Lost
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: 3,164
Mentioned: 337 Post(s)
Tagged: 17 Thread(s)


Default

TBH most of the ppl on here wasn't even around when most of the "greats" where heavily active and only know those "greats" even exist is because of those glory day textcees constantly going down memory lane. Obviously looking at LB from a historical approach comp was more intense in years past and everybody knows the comp u have naturally it fuels u to perform better.... those "greats" kind of fell back know and the ones that were average at best when the "greats" where active are know viewed at as the best active on the site... With lesser quality sitting on top today it makes the greats of the past seem even better than the were when they were active and makes the ones on top now seem better because of less quality textcees... I guess what I'm tryna say is it's hard to truly judge a top 25 when everybody's coming from different times, comp level, and expections. And if none of that shit made sense then my bad ma'fuckers...
Offline  
Reply With Quote