View Single Post
  #37  
Unread 02-25-2012, 03:17 PM
Just C
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,697
Mentioned: 616 Post(s)
Tagged: 41 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
62 Won / 1 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
75 Won / 24 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intricate Skillz View Post
Whether its innacurate or not! I already admitted it was a sub-par topical! But fuck! Yall are crucifying me over some dumb shit! When the other voters on the topical saw otherwise! So if u crack on me for the content, u must also crack on the voters for enjoying the fucked content!

---------- Post added at 03:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:50 PM ----------

But I already did rag on the voters. I said "People read some soppy shit about a soldier writing home and automatically go "bravo bravo" totally over looking the flaws"

Read my first comment. Lol Look I've got no problem in ragging on anyone. Anyone who knows me knows this. It doesn't mean I'm a dick head. It just means I'm more willing to pick out the bullshit I'm being fed. Bullshit might be too harsh a word in this case. The Topical wasn't terrible. Just extremely flawed, making it a tough pill to swallow.
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-25-2012, 03:17 PM   #37
 
Just C
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.72/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
62 Won / 1 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.72/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.95/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
75 Won / 24 Lost
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: 12,697
Mentioned: 616 Post(s)
Tagged: 41 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intricate Skillz View Post
Whether its innacurate or not! I already admitted it was a sub-par topical! But fuck! Yall are crucifying me over some dumb shit! When the other voters on the topical saw otherwise! So if u crack on me for the content, u must also crack on the voters for enjoying the fucked content!

---------- Post added at 03:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:50 PM ----------

But I already did rag on the voters. I said "People read some soppy shit about a soldier writing home and automatically go "bravo bravo" totally over looking the flaws"

Read my first comment. Lol Look I've got no problem in ragging on anyone. Anyone who knows me knows this. It doesn't mean I'm a dick head. It just means I'm more willing to pick out the bullshit I'm being fed. Bullshit might be too harsh a word in this case. The Topical wasn't terrible. Just extremely flawed, making it a tough pill to swallow.
Offline  
Reply With Quote