Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsFlow
It wasn't about the analogy. I agree with him completely. That when your against different people you have to take different approaches in doing things. And since your agruing with the owner of the site your wrong no matter what, and he can ban your ass no matter what happens.
It was the concept of whether he was right or wrong, "He should have went about it a different way, then blatantly arguing over it."
|
I get what he was saying, but we're talking about somebody talking shit to an admin on the internet and compairing it to what you would do if a police officer wronged you or abused his powers.
They naturally bring about their own set of responses in according to the 2 COMPLETELY different set of scenarios.
Thats like me saying to J
So you agree that you wouldnt of banned Eth
But what if you was a police officer and the "suspect" started getting in your face all argumentative?
You would arrest him
So therefore you should of banned eth.
You just can't compare the 2 like that.
It's so out of context