Thread: Site Idea!!
View Single Post
  #12  
Unread 09-02-2011, 10:35 AM
exZACHly
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,951
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
65 Won / 13 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.96/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.96/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.96/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
41 Won / 14 Lost
Default

No need to be a smartass about it...If it was going to happen (100 track credits to post a track) then 1-5 credit scale would be a good idea, but a long comment isn't necessarily alot of feedback...Anyways i check out my share of tracks, so i don't care either way...It's just that if everyone making tracks would actually check out each others tracks then you'd get the feedback you wanted....Plus more people making tracks would just knock off each others off of latest track list....Advertising is where it's at, and with a stickied thread there'd be one place to go to see them all, including ones that weren't too great or slept on or just really dope....As far as giving people a chance to post tracks that don't now, that's what these recent contests are for
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-02-2011, 10:35 AM   #12
 
exZACHly
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.33/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
65 Won / 13 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.33/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.96/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.96/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.96/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
41 Won / 14 Lost
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Voted: 323 audio / 474 text
Posts: 1,951
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)


Default

No need to be a smartass about it...If it was going to happen (100 track credits to post a track) then 1-5 credit scale would be a good idea, but a long comment isn't necessarily alot of feedback...Anyways i check out my share of tracks, so i don't care either way...It's just that if everyone making tracks would actually check out each others tracks then you'd get the feedback you wanted....Plus more people making tracks would just knock off each others off of latest track list....Advertising is where it's at, and with a stickied thread there'd be one place to go to see them all, including ones that weren't too great or slept on or just really dope....As far as giving people a chance to post tracks that don't now, that's what these recent contests are for
__________________
Offline  
Reply With Quote