Yeah UA has the point on that.

It all depends on what people want of the tournament though. Having seedings gives the strongest possible final and pretty much removes any form of a lopsided finale, but to me in the last few years the lack luster early rounds made people less interested for the good battles later on, hence voting issues.

I personally preferred the non seedings (and not because I dont get seeded as Ive NEVER had an easy tourny ride). I liked thinking that everyone round has a big clash of opponants in it, and especially in a year like this when we have mainly just up and comers around so instead of seeding them, having them face off would have been good.

Yeah UA has the point on that.

It all depends on what people want of the tournament though. Having seedings gives the strongest possible final and pretty much removes any form of a lopsided finale, but to me in the last few years the lack luster early rounds made people less interested for the good battles later on, hence voting issues.

I personally preferred the non seedings (and not because I dont get seeded as Ive NEVER had an easy tourny ride). I liked thinking that everyone round has a big clash of opponants in it, and especially in a year like this when we have mainly just up and comers around so instead of seeding them, having them face off would have been good.