View Single Post
  #36  
Unread 09-12-2010, 01:53 PM
GenKhysQ
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 486
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.39/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.39/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
27 Won / 4 Lost
Default

Anyway, seeing that this thread is actually getting serious.

we all should be aware that the topic of discussion here is actually about an "innovated/invented" "system"...

regardless of whatever, be it religion, politics...........

the "rule of mass" messes up the real reality vs. created reality dimensions. say, if there were 10 people on earth, if 9 of them think/believe in the same thing, and 1 deviate or think differently, that 1 person can be thought of as either a "rebel" or a "savior". there is actually only a very thin line between the two. There was a lot of other paths and outcomes "the world" could've taken. but why are we ending up the way we are???...

a few survived as "saviors" and are more sustainable because they get positive reinforcements..........."rebels" get treated the opposite......well also depends on a lot of countless numbers of factors so there is no point goin into details but mostly depends on the subjectivity of the world, the aggregate mind state. the aggregate mind state of the world or mass if you'd like is very spontaneous , always ongoing. the only way to understand everything better is if everything stopped but that can never happen.

most humans are only capable of thinking within the "scope of the KNOWN"......... you mix and match, borrow this from that, combine this and that..call it "development" still ...."innovation/invention" and "development" are completely on different levels.. developments are easier to achieve and takes less of a genius. but really we cant compare the two. personally, i believe in the future, whatever goes on in this world will only be a fragment. we will be working our minds on a "universal level".. i mean. more than just humans maybe?... ha i dont know... a possibility exist, cant quantify it but its not zero%

be an "innovator" and you'll see how dull everything really is, and you'll see much more
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-12-2010, 01:53 PM   #36
 
GenKhysQ
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.39/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.39/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
27 Won / 4 Lost
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Voted: 0 audio / 162 text
Posts: 486
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Anyway, seeing that this thread is actually getting serious.

we all should be aware that the topic of discussion here is actually about an "innovated/invented" "system"...

regardless of whatever, be it religion, politics...........

the "rule of mass" messes up the real reality vs. created reality dimensions. say, if there were 10 people on earth, if 9 of them think/believe in the same thing, and 1 deviate or think differently, that 1 person can be thought of as either a "rebel" or a "savior". there is actually only a very thin line between the two. There was a lot of other paths and outcomes "the world" could've taken. but why are we ending up the way we are???...

a few survived as "saviors" and are more sustainable because they get positive reinforcements..........."rebels" get treated the opposite......well also depends on a lot of countless numbers of factors so there is no point goin into details but mostly depends on the subjectivity of the world, the aggregate mind state. the aggregate mind state of the world or mass if you'd like is very spontaneous , always ongoing. the only way to understand everything better is if everything stopped but that can never happen.

most humans are only capable of thinking within the "scope of the KNOWN"......... you mix and match, borrow this from that, combine this and that..call it "development" still ...."innovation/invention" and "development" are completely on different levels.. developments are easier to achieve and takes less of a genius. but really we cant compare the two. personally, i believe in the future, whatever goes on in this world will only be a fragment. we will be working our minds on a "universal level".. i mean. more than just humans maybe?... ha i dont know... a possibility exist, cant quantify it but its not zero%

be an "innovator" and you'll see how dull everything really is, and you'll see much more
Offline  
Reply With Quote