View Single Post
  #4  
Unread 04-26-2010, 05:44 PM
remarK remarK is on FIRE! 10+ wins in a row!remarK is on FIRE! 10+ wins in a row!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,468
Mentioned: 418 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
28 Won / 14 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record
1 Won / 0 Lost

Estimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.39/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.39/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
216 Won / 51 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
4 Won / 1 Lost
Default

it was aiight, worth the watch IMO..

it doesn't revolutionize filmmaking in any way. It's just the steady-cam narrative like cloverfield and Blairwitch implemented into a ghost story..

I give the people props tho because they knew it would resonate with a large audience, took 15,000 of his own cash to make it, and is now in Hollywood probably because the film grossed a huge profit and is being shown all over the world.

So can't hate on it hard body.. AND a fun fact about the film.... shit was all improv, meaning there was no script.. gave it a more realistic feeling.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 04-26-2010, 05:44 PM   #4
 
remarK remarK is on FIRE! 10+ wins in a row!remarK is on FIRE! 10+ wins in a row!
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.56/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
28 Won / 14 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record
1 Won / 0 Lost

Estimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.56/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.39/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.39/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
216 Won / 51 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
4 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Voted: 116 audio / 911 text
Posts: 3,468
Mentioned: 418 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)


Default

it was aiight, worth the watch IMO..

it doesn't revolutionize filmmaking in any way. It's just the steady-cam narrative like cloverfield and Blairwitch implemented into a ghost story..

I give the people props tho because they knew it would resonate with a large audience, took 15,000 of his own cash to make it, and is now in Hollywood probably because the film grossed a huge profit and is being shown all over the world.

So can't hate on it hard body.. AND a fun fact about the film.... shit was all improv, meaning there was no script.. gave it a more realistic feeling.
__________________
Offline  
Reply With Quote