Originally Posted by WAR TANK

Ok, here is what I see.

1) People using what they reckon to be big words to make them seem smarter.

In actuality..who was using big words? To tell you the truth, nothing anyone in this thread (I personally think) has said anything that sounded "big" . If anything, people used the words in the context their definition meant. Anyways.

Expected reply. Heard it many times.

2) People who are looking for an origional and strong beliefs, to give them a sense of strong willingness and to make them have a feeling of not being a mere follower of the system (good in a way).

This isn't about what "i believe, you believe" okay buddy. quit the act. what seriously makes you think your some psychologist of this site? You obviously don't know me too well. In reality, we all are a follower to an extent. I will admit it because everybody is manipulated to an extent. But to what extent? Obviously I know what I'm talking about if I even self-consciously recognize that. That's why like I said you apply Logical Reasoning. eth please.

I see we are all followers to a greater, yet much lesser power. But I don't believe they are reptiles murdering all of the time and recruiting rappers.

3) People who have nothing short of a beliefs, like religion, and also like religion, saying non factual evidence is facts, all through their own beliefs, accept other theorys!.

^^ Yes unethical is an expert in psychology while debating in a thread that touches on a subject he has rare education on. You study youtube videos. That is not what I study buddy. Pick up a book once and a while.

The book industry is run by the government. Easy to manipulate.


To me, you people are basically running a new religion against the government. With the bible-like prophicies and relative connections, such as Jay Z's hoodie, his hand sign ect. Why can't you just accept that it may not be true? What do you have other than a belief? There is no solid evidence, and although it might seem quite convincing, as I said, there is many convincing evidence for Islam to be the true religion, and alot of Christians would fight highly against that.


Let's break this down. "new religion against the government" << 1st of all. We are discussing a topic. That is it. Is that hard to understand? A topic..not some kind of boycott on some fucking thread. Haha Eth don't be so quick to assume. I think your a sociopath to tell you the truth. 2nd : "why don't you accept that it might not be true?" << With quick unthoughtful words like that, I might aswell say that you should accept the fact that you might have been a hermaphrodite never finding out that ya shit coulda been chopped off >> just an example how simple "counter-discussion" tactis like that is the same typa bullshit Bill O'Reily tries to pull. Hahahaha. Whoah. "there is many convince evidence for islam to be the true religion" <<< Yup. Obviously didn't read shit. Proven point. Why discuss any further. Oh lord.

Ok, what i'm saying is, you people are trying to say it's fact with no evidence. I think it's crazy, but i accept your beliefs if you accept why i dont think its real. But you are all pulling the usual religious intollerence of ''Mine is fact, without proof, and if you don't believe it your wrong.''

Originally Posted by WAR TANK

Them..writing out these "Facts" to trick me. Possible: yes. Probable: no

Hypocrit.

Jay Z in the illiuminati. Possible: Yes Probably: LMAO

Originally Posted by WAR TANK

Ok, here is what I see.

1) People using what they reckon to be big words to make them seem smarter.

In actuality..who was using big words? To tell you the truth, nothing anyone in this thread (I personally think) has said anything that sounded "big" . If anything, people used the words in the context their definition meant. Anyways.

Expected reply. Heard it many times.

2) People who are looking for an origional and strong beliefs, to give them a sense of strong willingness and to make them have a feeling of not being a mere follower of the system (good in a way).

This isn't about what "i believe, you believe" okay buddy. quit the act. what seriously makes you think your some psychologist of this site? You obviously don't know me too well. In reality, we all are a follower to an extent. I will admit it because everybody is manipulated to an extent. But to what extent? Obviously I know what I'm talking about if I even self-consciously recognize that. That's why like I said you apply Logical Reasoning. eth please.

I see we are all followers to a greater, yet much lesser power. But I don't believe they are reptiles murdering all of the time and recruiting rappers.

3) People who have nothing short of a beliefs, like religion, and also like religion, saying non factual evidence is facts, all through their own beliefs, accept other theorys!.

^^ Yes unethical is an expert in psychology while debating in a thread that touches on a subject he has rare education on. You study youtube videos. That is not what I study buddy. Pick up a book once and a while.

The book industry is run by the government. Easy to manipulate.


To me, you people are basically running a new religion against the government. With the bible-like prophicies and relative connections, such as Jay Z's hoodie, his hand sign ect. Why can't you just accept that it may not be true? What do you have other than a belief? There is no solid evidence, and although it might seem quite convincing, as I said, there is many convincing evidence for Islam to be the true religion, and alot of Christians would fight highly against that.


Let's break this down. "new religion against the government" << 1st of all. We are discussing a topic. That is it. Is that hard to understand? A topic..not some kind of boycott on some fucking thread. Haha Eth don't be so quick to assume. I think your a sociopath to tell you the truth. 2nd : "why don't you accept that it might not be true?" << With quick unthoughtful words like that, I might aswell say that you should accept the fact that you might have been a hermaphrodite never finding out that ya shit coulda been chopped off >> just an example how simple "counter-discussion" tactis like that is the same typa bullshit Bill O'Reily tries to pull. Hahahaha. Whoah. "there is many convince evidence for islam to be the true religion" <<< Yup. Obviously didn't read shit. Proven point. Why discuss any further. Oh lord.

Ok, what i'm saying is, you people are trying to say it's fact with no evidence. I think it's crazy, but i accept your beliefs if you accept why i dont think its real. But you are all pulling the usual religious intollerence of ''Mine is fact, without proof, and if you don't believe it your wrong.''

Originally Posted by WAR TANK

Them..writing out these "Facts" to trick me. Possible: yes. Probable: no

Hypocrit.

Jay Z in the illiuminati. Possible: Yes Probably: LMAO