[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by EtH

Thats the point. The rule was that you defend 7 times. Rai didn't but was given the title. You cant then just take the title off of Rai die to someone elses mistake. Maybe he went weak in his next battle because he'd already won the top prize? Who knows. But if youre going directly by the tiles, Rai hasnt won the title, and imo thats really unfair to Rai.

So essentially, you can call this "Rai's 7th Defence". Because of someone else's mistake, he gets the opportunity to make that seventh defence knowing exactly what's at stake.

When’s RULE having his next 4 LBA defences to “properly earn the title”?

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by EtH

Thats the point. The rule was that you defend 7 times. Rai didn't but was given the title. You cant then just take the title off of Rai die to someone elses mistake. Maybe he went weak in his next battle because he'd already won the top prize? Who knows. But if youre going directly by the tiles, Rai hasnt won the title, and imo thats really unfair to Rai.

So essentially, you can call this "Rai's 7th Defence". Because of someone else's mistake, he gets the opportunity to make that seventh defence knowing exactly what's at stake.

When’s RULE having his next 4 LBA defences to “properly earn the title”?