[EtH]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

So if he hasn’t won the title why does he have it lmao? Why are we just making up more new rules to try and fix an issue that arose because of making up more new rules ?

Thats the point. The rule was that you defend 7 times. Rai didn't but was given the title. You cant then just take the title off of Rai die to someone elses mistake. Maybe he went weak in his next battle because he'd already won the top prize? Who knows. But if youre going directly by the tiles, Rai hasnt won the title, and imo thats really unfair to Rai.

So essentially, you can call this "Rai's 7th Defence". Because of someone else's mistake, he gets the opportunity to make that seventh defence knowing exactly what's at stake.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

So if he hasn’t won the title why does he have it lmao? Why are we just making up more new rules to try and fix an issue that arose because of making up more new rules ?

Thats the point. The rule was that you defend 7 times. Rai didn't but was given the title. You cant then just take the title off of Rai die to someone elses mistake. Maybe he went weak in his next battle because he'd already won the top prize? Who knows. But if youre going directly by the tiles, Rai hasnt won the title, and imo thats really unfair to Rai.

So essentially, you can call this "Rai's 7th Defence". Because of someone else's mistake, he gets the opportunity to make that seventh defence knowing exactly what's at stake.