[RULE]

Since the topic is hot lets discuss and make a determination on it once and for all.

so lets preface a little.

I created the LBT & LBA.

I ran them both for two years i think?

So when i created them, i didnt want ANY addition titles other than the one you hold as long as your champ. I was adamant on that point.

However... lol

ILLoKWENT went on a fuckin disgusting run of 10 wins in a row. And basically everyone felt he HAD to get something for such a great achievement.

So i decided he would get an addition title for the 10 win round.

He had 8 wins and 2 no shows. 32 lines against absolute killers. even though there was the 2 no shows he THROUGHLY deserves it.

And then i left the site (2014 ish?) until summer 2019.

When i returned i realised both Esso and Rai had recieved the title, as well as an audio one for Seul.

I was told the limit was changed to 7 victories, instead of 10, and that no shows had been high. Esso won the LBT on a no show but won 7 on the bounce and got the king title. Rai notched up 10 wins, 6 losses with 2 of the wins via no show.

And then theres Seul from the audio LBA who won 10 battles, 5 via no show and 1 loss. He got the LBA title and then finally me, with 9 wins, 2 losses and one win via no show.

So at first i though the rule was it had to be 7 wins in a row, then i asked if my reign was strong enough for the title and was told yes and recieved it.

so...


The simple question is, what should consitute a King title?

10 wins in a row? 10 wins period? 7? 5?

No shows count? they dont? How important is winning an actual battle?


as one of the 5 "kings" im happy to abide by any ruling on this.


As EtH now runs the LBT, i'd have no problem with him having the power of that section.

And with the LBA defunct (for now) perhaps the people should decide.


Discuss!

1/

[RULE]

Since the topic is hot lets discuss and make a determination on it once and for all.

so lets preface a little.

I created the LBT & LBA.

I ran them both for two years i think?

So when i created them, i didnt want ANY addition titles other than the one you hold as long as your champ. I was adamant on that point.

However... lol

ILLoKWENT went on a fuckin disgusting run of 10 wins in a row. And basically everyone felt he HAD to get something for such a great achievement.

So i decided he would get an addition title for the 10 win round.

He had 8 wins and 2 no shows. 32 lines against absolute killers. even though there was the 2 no shows he THROUGHLY deserves it.

And then i left the site (2014 ish?) until summer 2019.

When i returned i realised both Esso and Rai had recieved the title, as well as an audio one for Seul.

I was told the limit was changed to 7 victories, instead of 10, and that no shows had been high. Esso won the LBT on a no show but won 7 on the bounce and got the king title. Rai notched up 10 wins, 6 losses with 2 of the wins via no show.

And then theres Seul from the audio LBA who won 10 battles, 5 via no show and 1 loss. He got the LBA title and then finally me, with 9 wins, 2 losses and one win via no show.

So at first i though the rule was it had to be 7 wins in a row, then i asked if my reign was strong enough for the title and was told yes and recieved it.

so...


The simple question is, what should consitute a King title?

10 wins in a row? 10 wins period? 7? 5?

No shows count? they dont? How important is winning an actual battle?


as one of the 5 "kings" im happy to abide by any ruling on this.


As EtH now runs the LBT, i'd have no problem with him having the power of that section.

And with the LBA defunct (for now) perhaps the people should decide.


Discuss!

1/