[B U R D E N]

Originally Posted by Cecil

I believe it's fair to get his side of things, and to offer us insight on how he breaks down verses.

I can't lie, Shodan's explanations at times can be a bit critical. I've been here a while and I can't recall ever seeing him rate anyone higher than a 6. Also, a good majority of his votes are spent saying what was wrong with what he saw (I believe a well-explained vote sheds light on improvements needed as well as praise for good/decent work).

When people send me bars to critique or judge, I have to tell them over and over to make sure the wording is perfect because some voters will discredit your whole bar or verse because of one word being off. Even if the punchline is dope conceptually, if it's not worded perfectly then they won't give you credit. I was talking about Shodan lol although it makes you write better and more precise, it's still a sucky truth that you really could write a dope bar and because of one word or term not fitting like he thinks it should, it might destroy your whole verse's chances of standing up to your opponent's.

So, all in all I think his critical fashion of voting helps you write better, but I also understand the frustration behind the way his votes come off to people. There are lot of people who feel this way about Sho.

Oh I fuck w the way he doesn't sugarcoat shit, like you said it'll help in more ways than not for most members on here. The issue I have w his voting is that I'm always seeing his expo's not match up to what I see in the battles he votes on. I know I'm only 1 dude w my own opinion & ways of seeing shit but I'm no amateur to what's going on w this battling shit & feel that I can break down a verse pretty well. It's like sayin someone's multis are completely broken when they're solid or saying there's no set ups at all to someone's verse when their set ups are nearly as strong as the punch.

Shit just isn't matching up imo.

[B U R D E N]

Originally Posted by Cecil

I believe it's fair to get his side of things, and to offer us insight on how he breaks down verses.

I can't lie, Shodan's explanations at times can be a bit critical. I've been here a while and I can't recall ever seeing him rate anyone higher than a 6. Also, a good majority of his votes are spent saying what was wrong with what he saw (I believe a well-explained vote sheds light on improvements needed as well as praise for good/decent work).

When people send me bars to critique or judge, I have to tell them over and over to make sure the wording is perfect because some voters will discredit your whole bar or verse because of one word being off. Even if the punchline is dope conceptually, if it's not worded perfectly then they won't give you credit. I was talking about Shodan lol although it makes you write better and more precise, it's still a sucky truth that you really could write a dope bar and because of one word or term not fitting like he thinks it should, it might destroy your whole verse's chances of standing up to your opponent's.

So, all in all I think his critical fashion of voting helps you write better, but I also understand the frustration behind the way his votes come off to people. There are lot of people who feel this way about Sho.

Oh I fuck w the way he doesn't sugarcoat shit, like you said it'll help in more ways than not for most members on here. The issue I have w his voting is that I'm always seeing his expo's not match up to what I see in the battles he votes on. I know I'm only 1 dude w my own opinion & ways of seeing shit but I'm no amateur to what's going on w this battling shit & feel that I can break down a verse pretty well. It's like sayin someone's multis are completely broken when they're solid or saying there's no set ups at all to someone's verse when their set ups are nearly as strong as the punch.

Shit just isn't matching up imo.