Quote:
Originally Posted by Rant
How about from the legal standpoint, in that case? "Sensitivities" aside, there's an underlying potential legal issue with the current standard. With no age restriction, or mention to age outside of the small section in the privacy policy, you tread risky waters legally as the site owner in regard to COPPA, and the new reformations to the GDPR in Europe. An age restriction, and subsequent age verification mechanism helps to alleviate this on the basis of legality. As it said in the privacy policy, they do not collect data from children. But, without an age verification system, how is administration to determine who is a child, in order to refrain from data collection from those individuals?
|
If you're as incontrovertibly correct as you put it across, I suggest you take the issue direct to the moderators and administration. For Rant, if the stakes are as dire as this, and we're in the line of fire of the GDPR, COPPA and URACUNT then the fate of the site falls squarely on your shoulders, for having been the solitary intellect to notice such a gaping flaw in the site's fundamental structure. Go now, and act quickly, the site needs you
---------- Post added at 09:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:31 PM ----------
u twat