Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

But no crew has more than 9 active members.

Apoc has a whole two crews in their ranks. All active. 14 of them. Minus the two who don't exist, by your logic, because they're LESS active. (But still log on frequently. Like a lot of AC's members...)

And why are we including red ribbon, anyway? Since inactive members don't count, again, by your bastardization, as they're comprised almost entirely of inactive members.

Anyway, my two threads are not OVERTLY interconnected. Limiting the crews should happen with or without a draft, because of the stimulus it provides to the voting pool.

But, since we're arguing them as a singular point. Not only does limiting the crews in this way propagate voting growth. But, a draft also allows more active members of almost entirely inactive crews to join more active, competition based crews. And as its primarily rooted in a voluntary basis it gives other members a chance to build their own crews outside of the draft structure, if they so choose. People who might be more interested in running a crew as opposed to competing explicitly themselves, e.g. a RULE type.

Not only that, but it shakes things up battle wise, in regard to match ups. People are inherently less inclined to battle their own crew members outside of tournies/ppvs. A recurring draft allots fresher match ups, and more opportunities not only for varied and growing voting. But, for more things to vote ON as a reader. I, personally, get sick of reading the same battles over and over again.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

But no crew has more than 9 active members.

Apoc has a whole two crews in their ranks. All active. 14 of them. Minus the two who don't exist, by your logic, because they're LESS active. (But still log on frequently. Like a lot of AC's members...)

And why are we including red ribbon, anyway? Since inactive members don't count, again, by your bastardization, as they're comprised almost entirely of inactive members.

Anyway, my two threads are not OVERTLY interconnected. Limiting the crews should happen with or without a draft, because of the stimulus it provides to the voting pool.

But, since we're arguing them as a singular point. Not only does limiting the crews in this way propagate voting growth. But, a draft also allows more active members of almost entirely inactive crews to join more active, competition based crews. And as its primarily rooted in a voluntary basis it gives other members a chance to build their own crews outside of the draft structure, if they so choose. People who might be more interested in running a crew as opposed to competing explicitly themselves, e.g. a RULE type.

Not only that, but it shakes things up battle wise, in regard to match ups. People are inherently less inclined to battle their own crew members outside of tournies/ppvs. A recurring draft allots fresher match ups, and more opportunities not only for varied and growing voting. But, for more things to vote ON as a reader. I, personally, get sick of reading the same battles over and over again.