View Single Post
  #11  
Unread 02-12-2018, 06:36 PM
Row
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shodan View Post
I get where you're coming from. I don't believe the title match has ever been shortened, or shortening it ever even being discussed at all.

In the end, of course, it's NOBLE who decides whether or not it's allowed.
altho the fact that it's been 32s is the main reason why i stay away from pursuing an LBT Championship. but if it ends up changing, its best to implement it after title holders change, and not in between a run of title defenses.

EDIT: imo
Unread 02-12-2018, 06:36 PM   #11
 
Row
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shodan View Post
I get where you're coming from. I don't believe the title match has ever been shortened, or shortening it ever even being discussed at all.

In the end, of course, it's NOBLE who decides whether or not it's allowed.
altho the fact that it's been 32s is the main reason why i stay away from pursuing an LBT Championship. but if it ends up changing, its best to implement it after title holders change, and not in between a run of title defenses.

EDIT: imo