[Erupt da Monsta]

Originally Posted by Student

I support it on this basis: That people receive enough to cover the basics, to pay their bills and that's it. With the freedom of not worrying about shelter or food then people are able to be creative and brand out into endeavors based on love for what they do, not on the ability to provide for their family. Of course there's going to be people who take advantage of the system and simply don't work BUT they'll live a unfulfilled and boring life.

In theory it makes sense but then again people aren't perfect and therefore it won't be a "perfect system" so it's open to be manipulated.

This^

I feel it would benefit those with dreams and ambitions at the mid-highest level more comfy and more creative,and only make those with less ambition fall deeper into a dark abyss once they become even more reliable on the government.

Its almost like how welfare for the black community, etc if you understand that logic and how it made a certain type of people more dependable, and less active

so in theory it would be benefiting the governments agenda at a deeper level, which im sure none of us could comprehend fully at this time.

---------- Post added at 02:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:44 PM ----------

Basically it sounds like a way to make people even more dependent on A.I. If we dont have to work as hard, we get lazy in turn, thats when AI / robots and technology comes into play. Making it even easier for the AI/Robot/Technology takeover which at the end of the day is the agenda.

[Erupt da Monsta]

Originally Posted by Student

I support it on this basis: That people receive enough to cover the basics, to pay their bills and that's it. With the freedom of not worrying about shelter or food then people are able to be creative and brand out into endeavors based on love for what they do, not on the ability to provide for their family. Of course there's going to be people who take advantage of the system and simply don't work BUT they'll live a unfulfilled and boring life.

In theory it makes sense but then again people aren't perfect and therefore it won't be a "perfect system" so it's open to be manipulated.

This^

I feel it would benefit those with dreams and ambitions at the mid-highest level more comfy and more creative,and only make those with less ambition fall deeper into a dark abyss once they become even more reliable on the government.

Its almost like how welfare for the black community, etc if you understand that logic and how it made a certain type of people more dependable, and less active

so in theory it would be benefiting the governments agenda at a deeper level, which im sure none of us could comprehend fully at this time.

---------- Post added at 02:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:44 PM ----------

Basically it sounds like a way to make people even more dependent on A.I. If we dont have to work as hard, we get lazy in turn, thats when AI / robots and technology comes into play. Making it even easier for the AI/Robot/Technology takeover which at the end of the day is the agenda.