12-19-2017, 02:34 PM
|
#3
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OSKAR
Yes!The challenger held his end of the bargain so he deserves it. He will defend it against the no 1 contender in the following card so I don't see why vacating it till then. Bare in mind, asking the no.1 contender to earn that contendership and then battle again for the championship (with little amount to prepare whereas the one who won by no show might recycle bars) is unfair .
|
Glad I polled this.
|
|
|
|