Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums - View Single Post - Should the LBT/LBA Be Decided By No Shows?

**OSKAR** · #2 12-19-2017, 02:30 PM

Yes!The challenger held his end of the bargain so he deserves it. He will defend it against the no 1 contender in the following card so I don't see why vacating it till then. Bare in mind, asking the no.1 contender to earn that contendership and then battle again for the championship (with little amount to prepare whereas the one who won by no show might recycle bars) is unfair .

**OSKAR** · 12-19-2017, 02:30 PM

Yes!The challenger held his end of the bargain so he deserves it. He will defend it against the no 1 contender in the following card so I don't see why vacating it till then. Bare in mind, asking the no.1 contender to earn that contendership and then battle again for the championship (with little amount to prepare whereas the one who won by no show might recycle bars) is unfair .

12-19-2017, 02:30 PM	#2
OSKAR <Classick At Rhymin> Ranked Audio Record 23 Won / 7 Lost Ranked Text Record 4 Won / 5 Lost Join Date: May 2010 Voted: 108 audio / 116 text Posts: 2,188 Mentioned: 1070 Post(s) Tagged: 31 Thread(s)	Yes!The challenger held his end of the bargain so he deserves it. He will defend it against the no 1 contender in the following card so I don't see why vacating it till then. Bare in mind, asking the no.1 contender to earn that contendership and then battle again for the championship (with little amount to prepare whereas the one who won by no show might recycle bars) is unfair .
Offline