[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Aggo

Would it make sense and/or be possible to have it correlate points awarded for wins to the difference between a battlers ranks. So if "#1 bnas", beats "#60,000 just joined the site and had his first battle, Nobody", then bnas gets almost no points. But if newbie beats #1 He gets a butt ton of points for that battle.

I'm not articulating this well currently cuz it's late on a weekend, and I does this. But I think you get the drift.

I think it already works that way to some extent. It's related to the stars system. If you have open battles and you look on your page, it tells you how many stars each battle is worth, and that also ties into how high up the hotlist it reaches depending on what other battles are up.

If you check out the exclusive league rankings, for example, you will see that some people are rated higher and have more points off the same amount of wins than others. This is because they got more points off those wins.

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Aggo

Would it make sense and/or be possible to have it correlate points awarded for wins to the difference between a battlers ranks. So if "#1 bnas", beats "#60,000 just joined the site and had his first battle, Nobody", then bnas gets almost no points. But if newbie beats #1 He gets a butt ton of points for that battle.

I'm not articulating this well currently cuz it's late on a weekend, and I does this. But I think you get the drift.

I think it already works that way to some extent. It's related to the stars system. If you have open battles and you look on your page, it tells you how many stars each battle is worth, and that also ties into how high up the hotlist it reaches depending on what other battles are up.

If you check out the exclusive league rankings, for example, you will see that some people are rated higher and have more points off the same amount of wins than others. This is because they got more points off those wins.