Quote:
Originally Posted by Esso
It's not really an argument against you as much as it is your opinion that it would bolster activity. If the active people are saying it would make them less active, we are already assured of seeing less activity if a change goes into place. We have no confirmation at all though that it would make anyone else actually battle more.
What's the end game here? To inspire the Erupt's and Illokwent's and other champs of the past to come back to battling? Maybe it will work with a couple but just like tons of folks come outta the woodwork for the GC they'll eventually leave again because there's a reason most of em are inactive to begin with. Why would you want to alienate those who are currently active for the sake of trying to light a fire underneath those that have obviously moved on?
|
. At this point you are assuming that those that say they won't be thrilled with defensible titles and won't have the motivation to participate is a fair assumption but still speculative... There has to be a reason why @
NOBLE would even concieve this narrative in the first place.. it's because activity is still weak ATM, and he is proactively thinking of something DIFFERENT AND REFRESHING.not the same old tried and true formula that everyone's grown accustomed to and tired of . face facts people keep complaining they want new stuff, yet when someone puts out something that actually would be fun and different, it takes someone out of their comfort zone.. trust me, activity will not diminish, because frankly it ain't that great now, but can only get better. And those that say they'll not battle are full of shit, because at the end of the day, this is still the best structured battle site and their competitive spirit will prevail..you need to have more faith in trying something different.. @
NOBLE when your ready to do this yank all my titles, I may have to come out of retirement to show these yungins how it's done again