[Esso]

Originally Posted by RULE

I think having permenant titles is a big part of what motivates people to enter tourneys.

Taking them away might hamper activity. Which is the last thing we need atm.

1/

This. I think the potential of interchangeable titles is still slightly untapped but theres a reason bigger names crawl out of the woodwork for tournaments...theres prestige attached and you can battle against better comp than whats consistently active then not feel obligated to keep being active afterwards. It would suck to have tourney champs start to no show once they dont want to go thru the rigor of defending it...or tourney attendance go down because the favorites wouldnt be interested in sticking around to defend.

[Esso]

Originally Posted by RULE

I think having permenant titles is a big part of what motivates people to enter tourneys.

Taking them away might hamper activity. Which is the last thing we need atm.

1/

This. I think the potential of interchangeable titles is still slightly untapped but theres a reason bigger names crawl out of the woodwork for tournaments...theres prestige attached and you can battle against better comp than whats consistently active then not feel obligated to keep being active afterwards. It would suck to have tourney champs start to no show once they dont want to go thru the rigor of defending it...or tourney attendance go down because the favorites wouldnt be interested in sticking around to defend.