View Single Post
  #7  
Unread 10-28-2017, 03:33 PM
Babylon Babylon is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,132
Mentioned: 1428 Post(s)
Tagged: 40 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
63 Won / 15 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
66 Won / 21 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
2 Won / 0 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBLE View Post
Depends on how it's brought about. The U.S could denuclearize North Korea by levelling the place with bombs, but would the conflict be limited to only the United States and North Korea? Depending on who else gets involved and how long the conflict lasts, it could adversely impact world economy.
Do you think North Korea would happily submit as those bombs begin falling or are you drastically overconfident in the ability of a US surgical strike on north korea? The moment the US starts "leveling the place with bombs" are you so sure kim jong wouldnt just detonate his armament wherever he could? Resulting in mass casualties not even considering the mass death leveling the place with bombs would provide. Denuclearization diplomatically isn't a foreseeable plan either to me. Kim jong is too unstable. Likely gonna end in some kind of combat situation be it small or large/soon or far from now.
__________________
.
Reply With Quote
Unread 10-28-2017, 03:33 PM   #7
 
Babylon Babylon is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
63 Won / 15 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
66 Won / 21 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
2 Won / 0 Lost
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Voted: 289 audio / 238 text
Posts: 4,132
Mentioned: 1428 Post(s)
Tagged: 40 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBLE View Post
Depends on how it's brought about. The U.S could denuclearize North Korea by levelling the place with bombs, but would the conflict be limited to only the United States and North Korea? Depending on who else gets involved and how long the conflict lasts, it could adversely impact world economy.
Do you think North Korea would happily submit as those bombs begin falling or are you drastically overconfident in the ability of a US surgical strike on north korea? The moment the US starts "leveling the place with bombs" are you so sure kim jong wouldnt just detonate his armament wherever he could? Resulting in mass casualties not even considering the mass death leveling the place with bombs would provide. Denuclearization diplomatically isn't a foreseeable plan either to me. Kim jong is too unstable. Likely gonna end in some kind of combat situation be it small or large/soon or far from now.
__________________
.
Offline  
Reply With Quote