Quote:
Originally Posted by gadzooks
Thats a pretty good point, in the past I used a judging system akin to Knamelis' one whereby you give each battler a "point" when something creative or impactful enough comes along & the one with the most "points" at the end of the round gets that round- but I just used the round-by-round system here as its the most common.
|
In my opinion, voting rubrics or formulas
of any kind should never determine the winner. I've done so previously, but now see it as mistaken. Battles are too complex and intuitive to be determined formulaically. The only good method of judging is holistically.
EDIT: They can help you come to your conclusion and explain things more clearly, of course. They just shouldn't be used to directly choose the winner.
---------- Post added at 09:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 PM ----------
Aight, so I just watched this shit. I think Bigg K won by a hair but I could see the arguments for giving it to Pat Stay. I think this one comes down to preference, mostly Pat's delivery, aggression, and personal angles versus Bigg K's more complex punches.