View Single Post
  #10  
Unread 03-26-2017, 01:48 PM
Wayco Wayco is on FIRE! 15+ wins in a row!Wayco is on FIRE! 15+ wins in a row!Wayco is on FIRE! 15+ wins in a row!
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 346
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 11 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
339 Won / 49 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.65/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.65/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.65/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.65/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
109 Won / 80 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagga Lee View Post
The point I was trying to make is that it is no less unreasonable--- for one to expect to not face consequences such as being fired from their job or being called a racist/homophobe/bigot (etc.) if they (especially as a public figure) use racial slurs or make disparaging comments towards LGBTQ or other minorities by the "PC" people ---as it is for me to expect to not face the Secret Service or some other consequence if I use my free speech in a certain way toward the President of the United States.
What's a "threat" can be subjective, and some people in minority groups perceive certain disparaging or insensitive statements to be just as threatening when it comes from high-profile and influential people. For example, it can be statistically proven that there has been a spike in hate crimes against people of certain ethnic backgrounds since Donald Trump has made disparaging comments against Muslims. So is it unreasonable for them to be "PC" about Donald Trump's choice of words?
The major difference is one is about freedom of political views and the other is about physically harming someone. It's really not comparable. And saying let's kill someone isn't the same as saying enforce the laws or stating a factual statement people may not agree with. Some people might say black people are violent, should they be fired? What if it was pc to say that? Then in that case should a black person be fired for saying there's systemic racism? Slippery slope. *edit* and let's make it clear, there's a distinction between not being pc and using hate speech or being a racists. They're not synonymous with each other.

---------- Post added at 10:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:45 AM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicholas View Post
Well, I guess that ends our conversation. If you're not capable of discussing a subject without this kind of post I'm not going to waste my time.



Oh OK, my mistake. Yeah, I agree of course that is wrong.

I understand what you're saying but I am going to call you a pedant as whilst a fascist regime might not inherently be tied to discrimination it is characteristic of those in recent history. Also, Nazi Germany seems like a bad example to use. It was a very racist regime as well as anti-semitic.
That's my 100% honest definition. It's bullshit. And a joke honestly. Btw you've said nothing in 6 comments we were done long ago homie.

Last edited by Wayco; 03-26-2017 at 02:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
Unread 03-26-2017, 01:48 PM   #10
 
Wayco Wayco is on FIRE! 15+ wins in a row!Wayco is on FIRE! 15+ wins in a row!Wayco is on FIRE! 15+ wins in a row!
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.03/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
339 Won / 49 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.03/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.65/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.65/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.65/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.65/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
109 Won / 80 Lost
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Voted: 905 audio / 244 text
Posts: 346
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 11 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swagga Lee View Post
The point I was trying to make is that it is no less unreasonable--- for one to expect to not face consequences such as being fired from their job or being called a racist/homophobe/bigot (etc.) if they (especially as a public figure) use racial slurs or make disparaging comments towards LGBTQ or other minorities by the "PC" people ---as it is for me to expect to not face the Secret Service or some other consequence if I use my free speech in a certain way toward the President of the United States.
What's a "threat" can be subjective, and some people in minority groups perceive certain disparaging or insensitive statements to be just as threatening when it comes from high-profile and influential people. For example, it can be statistically proven that there has been a spike in hate crimes against people of certain ethnic backgrounds since Donald Trump has made disparaging comments against Muslims. So is it unreasonable for them to be "PC" about Donald Trump's choice of words?
The major difference is one is about freedom of political views and the other is about physically harming someone. It's really not comparable. And saying let's kill someone isn't the same as saying enforce the laws or stating a factual statement people may not agree with. Some people might say black people are violent, should they be fired? What if it was pc to say that? Then in that case should a black person be fired for saying there's systemic racism? Slippery slope. *edit* and let's make it clear, there's a distinction between not being pc and using hate speech or being a racists. They're not synonymous with each other.

---------- Post added at 10:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:45 AM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicholas View Post
Well, I guess that ends our conversation. If you're not capable of discussing a subject without this kind of post I'm not going to waste my time.



Oh OK, my mistake. Yeah, I agree of course that is wrong.

I understand what you're saying but I am going to call you a pedant as whilst a fascist regime might not inherently be tied to discrimination it is characteristic of those in recent history. Also, Nazi Germany seems like a bad example to use. It was a very racist regime as well as anti-semitic.
That's my 100% honest definition. It's bullshit. And a joke honestly. Btw you've said nothing in 6 comments we were done long ago homie.

Last edited by Wayco; 03-26-2017 at 02:12 PM.
Offline  
Reply With Quote