[Wayco]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I didn't call you a fascist, I said "let me give you an example" and then gave you an example.

You also changed my example I said "mexican immigrants are rapists and murderers" that statement implies all mexican immigrants. The changed quote you wrote "mexican people commit crimes" is much more factual, we can both agree on that.

Again, if we're going to have a discussion it might be wise to refrain from childish insults. If you want to have a discussion on the points then lets do it.

I already laid out what I thought but instead of sticking to the discussion you made up a what if scenario. You can scroll up and tell me my fault in logic.

---------- Post added at 09:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:48 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Nicholas

How are we defining politically correct? Equal rights for all & the end of minority discrimination? We would all be for that would we not?

You define being politically correct that way. I define it as your definition being the shield you use to avoid actual debate. Your last 3 questions exemplifies the problem with pc.

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I didn't call you a fascist, I said "let me give you an example" and then gave you an example.

You also changed my example I said "mexican immigrants are rapists and murderers" that statement implies all mexican immigrants. The changed quote you wrote "mexican people commit crimes" is much more factual, we can both agree on that.

Again, if we're going to have a discussion it might be wise to refrain from childish insults. If you want to have a discussion on the points then lets do it.

I already laid out what I thought but instead of sticking to the discussion you made up a what if scenario. You can scroll up and tell me my fault in logic.

---------- Post added at 09:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:48 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Nicholas

How are we defining politically correct? Equal rights for all & the end of minority discrimination? We would all be for that would we not?

You define being politically correct that way. I define it as your definition being the shield you use to avoid actual debate. Your last 3 questions exemplifies the problem with pc.