Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindless
>distributed denial of service is easier on low traffic sites
Uhm, no. Because if there's a shitload of traffic there's fewer resources available that your attack needs to tie up to take the site down.
There's been tons of errors lately and as per usual nobody with the power to do anything about it is. I don't remember if it was Noble or Pugz but one of them didn't even log in for over a month and the other one was like three weeks or so. They really need to just sell this place to someone who's going to do something with it already.
|
These Are Two Loaded Arguments.
The Urge To Attack A Low Security Site With Comparably High Traffic Will Always Be Stronger Than That Of A Low Security Site With Low Traffic. Unless You Are In A Tryout Stage (Due To Pending Ramifications).
And I Am Extremely Sure You're Aware That The Site Will Not Be "The Same" After It Has Been Sold To Someone With Grandiose Plans For It. But Of Course The Means Justify The Results In This Case. Naturally I Would Be One Of The People That Would Benefit The Least If Something Like That Would Occur. Hell, I Don't Even Come Close To Paying For The Most Money Grabbing Freemium Games That I Play That Otherwise Result In Ludicrously Tedious Grinding Sessions.