Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattan
So, you're trying to say that we need more active voters (Which everyone agrees with) However, you're saying that those who have proven themselves good voters (FVC) should have a lower VP. So instead of rewarding good voters and also providing a good incentive for good voters...we should instead drop their VP? Which in turn...will have less FVC members coming around...which will drop voting activity. That's ass backwards. Honestly, we don't just need more voters. We need more people dropping votes who come here regularly. You've got people bitching about having no votes on their battles, and yet they don't ever seem to vote.
|
You're over exaggerating Manny. How is dropping VP going to make less fvc come around. When I just explained that we need more / better fvc, and more/better voting mods.don't drop it completely, but say I have 4 fair votes on a battle, with good explanations, 1 mod can come in, drop a vote with a half assed expo. And give the opponent who originally had 0 votes the win. Ive seen it happen, and its happened to me. When a mods vote can be stronger than 4 regular members vote, there is a problem. Mods and fvc rarely vote on audio battles outside of tournaments. So if you're wondering why the audio section is dead, its because of the mods being in favor of text battles., you included..
& those who have proven themselves to be good voters, should not overpower 3-4 other voters, people have different ways of judging battles. Personally I listen for the verse that would get better crowd reaction if it was a live event in today's standard of battle rap. I think there should only be +1 and +2 vp..but hey..people who are already mods/fvc will obviously argue my opinion because they don't want new mods.