Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattan
So, you're trying to say that we need more active voters (Which everyone agrees with) However, you're saying that those who have proven themselves good voters (FVC) should have a lower VP. So instead of rewarding good voters and also providing a good incentive for good voters...we should instead drop their VP? Which in turn...will have less FVC members coming around...which will drop voting activity. That's ass backwards. Honestly, we don't just need more voters. We need more people dropping votes who come here regularly. You've got people bitching about having no votes on their battles, and yet they don't ever seem to vote.
|
Manhatten
I Am An Excellent Voter (With No Voting Power), I Have Always Been An Excellent Voter (Without Ever Leaving Much Expos) And Have Encouraged People For 5 Years To Drop Links On My Various Voting Threads. If 2000 Links Would Have Appeared On My Voting Threads I Would Have Voted On Every Single One Of Them (Although It Would Have Not Mattered As My Voting Power Was Lowered Considerably, Resulting In My Vote Being Solely Usable Towards The 3 Vote Closing Requirement Of Any Battle Rather Than A Decisive Measure.
Another Thing, You Are Clearly Insinuating That A Major Draw For Lesser Members (Almost Everyone Else Except Mindless And Me) For Joining The FVC Is Having Superior Voting Power. Which In Turn Illustrates The Catch 22 Situation The Slightly Less Retarded Person You Quoted Is Talking About.
Think Before You 'Speak', Buddy. It Makes You Look Bad To The Knowledgeable People (Me).