View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 03-02-2015, 01:06 PM
Rant
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBLE View Post
^^I was just about to say...after careful observation, I believe one of the rows was a bit larger than the others, so when the corner square was taken, it was compensated for by the difference in size of the larger rows to still produce a 4 x 6 rectangle.
Mathematics.

Last edited by Rant; 03-02-2015 at 01:10 PM. Reason: Avoidance of redundancy.
Reply With Quote
Unread 03-02-2015, 01:06 PM   #1
 
Rant
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBLE View Post
^^I was just about to say...after careful observation, I believe one of the rows was a bit larger than the others, so when the corner square was taken, it was compensated for by the difference in size of the larger rows to still produce a 4 x 6 rectangle.
Mathematics.

Last edited by Rant; 03-02-2015 at 01:10 PM. Reason: Avoidance of redundancy.
 
Reply With Quote