[J u s T C]

Not directed at your opponent?

I get the vibe on here that no matter what, people will/would vote for the guy "attempting" to throw punches against the guy roasting the fuck out of his opponent creatively using zero punches.

Whats the point if the punches aren't in direct reference to the opponent and or they are just formulaic, cliche'd said a million times before 1 size fits all punches.

Where's the creativity in that.

This idea that you have to be seen to be at least throwing punchlines, no matter how poor they are is contradictory to what the site is about. Creative writing.


You're supposed to be battling your opponent, not the voters.

But you can bet your bottom dolla that the guy clowning his opponent creatively while showing imagination and wit without a punch in sight will be fighting a losing battle against a corny run of the mill INDIRECT puncher before the votes even come rolling in.

So now what you have is a bunch of clones scared to step from the norm because losses.

You don't think that's wrong?

[J u s T C]

Not directed at your opponent?

I get the vibe on here that no matter what, people will/would vote for the guy "attempting" to throw punches against the guy roasting the fuck out of his opponent creatively using zero punches.

Whats the point if the punches aren't in direct reference to the opponent and or they are just formulaic, cliche'd said a million times before 1 size fits all punches.

Where's the creativity in that.

This idea that you have to be seen to be at least throwing punchlines, no matter how poor they are is contradictory to what the site is about. Creative writing.


You're supposed to be battling your opponent, not the voters.

But you can bet your bottom dolla that the guy clowning his opponent creatively while showing imagination and wit without a punch in sight will be fighting a losing battle against a corny run of the mill INDIRECT puncher before the votes even come rolling in.

So now what you have is a bunch of clones scared to step from the norm because losses.

You don't think that's wrong?