Thread: Proposed Cap
View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 02-02-2015, 05:52 AM
J u s T C J u s T C is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,812
Mentioned: 1535 Post(s)
Tagged: 21 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Default Proposed Cap

I know Pugz has been asking for people to tone down on posting so many battles.

It kills the credibility of the rankings.

People don't dare post opens because *insert name* will snipe their battle for the hundreth time.

No cap has created a sniping obsession equaling quantity over quality.

People will avoid voting on a lot of battles because "oh it's this guy again and he can't even be assed to write up a quality verse so why should I be assed to vote"


I'm suggesting a 7 to 14 battles a week cap.

In theory

This will bring creditability back to the rankings.
Encourage people to put more effort into their verses.
Thus encourage more voting
And better voting because people wont be trigger gb vb voting to get their 100 battles a week in.

Bare in mind most sites struggle to get votes on 1 battle a WEEK.

Even with these caps we'd still be allowing a shit ton more battles and votes than any other active site.

So where are the sniping complainers going to go?

Nowhere. lol

They might test the waters elsewhere while the cap timer winds down to get their fix, but they'll soon realize this place caters to them more than anywhere else when their battles have been open for a month straight gathering dust with no votes.

What you think
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody View Post

I'm part German myself.

Fuck off, I got work to do.
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-02-2015, 05:52 AM   #1
 
J u s T C J u s T C is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Voted: 46 audio / 30 text
Posts: 6,812
Mentioned: 1535 Post(s)
Tagged: 21 Thread(s)


Default Proposed Cap

I know Pugz has been asking for people to tone down on posting so many battles.

It kills the credibility of the rankings.

People don't dare post opens because *insert name* will snipe their battle for the hundreth time.

No cap has created a sniping obsession equaling quantity over quality.

People will avoid voting on a lot of battles because "oh it's this guy again and he can't even be assed to write up a quality verse so why should I be assed to vote"


I'm suggesting a 7 to 14 battles a week cap.

In theory

This will bring creditability back to the rankings.
Encourage people to put more effort into their verses.
Thus encourage more voting
And better voting because people wont be trigger gb vb voting to get their 100 battles a week in.

Bare in mind most sites struggle to get votes on 1 battle a WEEK.

Even with these caps we'd still be allowing a shit ton more battles and votes than any other active site.

So where are the sniping complainers going to go?

Nowhere. lol

They might test the waters elsewhere while the cap timer winds down to get their fix, but they'll soon realize this place caters to them more than anywhere else when their battles have been open for a month straight gathering dust with no votes.

What you think
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody View Post

I'm part German myself.

Fuck off, I got work to do.
Offline  
Reply With Quote