Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBLE
See...that's what I'm talking about. You found out that staff knew about the accusation and you jumped to the conclusion that they didn't discuss it until you were personally told by ILLoKWENT that we did discuss it? You also seem to have jumped to the conclusion that we didn't make a huge announcement about it or that no punitive measures were taken because of Erupt's status and that if it had been someone lesser known, we would have concluded differently? When was the last time you've ever heard a staff member discussing publicly the possibility that someone may have bitten while that accusation was still being considered and they weren't sure? That would be reckless. Usually when threads like that are made, it's by a regular member...not a staff member. There's no point in throwing shade saying Erupt or whoever may have bitten unless we've concluded that they have bitten and are about to hand out an infraction. And trust me, there's no such thing as "status" when it comes to someone breaking the rules of LetsBeef. Anyone can be banned or stripped of their title. If you don't agree with the decision, that's one thing. But I just don't understand why all the assumptions about staff simply because you hadn't heard about it till now.
|
So I or anyone shouldn't be able to hone our opinions for the matter? Just mods and staff make the judgment..? Letsbeef is a community, everyone should be able to give their opinions on the matter. I worked my ass off to get to the GC and you're telling me I shouldn't know if there's a possible bite in questioning, rather on the biggest stage? Idk man.. Like I said, I was under the impression it was being being looked-away on, than I was corrected and okay w/ the situation.